Back to @iamAyeshaPTI's profile

Ayesha Khan engagement report

@iamAyeshaPTI - 57K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
1.73%
of 57K followers
Per impression
3.09%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
56.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
990
interactions (median)
Saved
0.084%
27 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 990 interactions against 57K followers, an engagement rate of 1.73%. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 56.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.73%, Ayesha Khan sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 328 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 18, 202620x their median

    🚨BREAKING: 40+ leading global scholars, public intellectuals, and human rights advocates have issued an urgent international letter demanding immediate medical access for former Prime Minister Imran Khan @ImranKhanPTI and an end to his arbitrary detention. The letter warns of severe ocular damage following prolonged medical neglect in custody. Signatories include: Dr. Naledi Pandor, @JohnLEsposito D. Yanis Varoufakis @yanisvaroufakis, Noura Erakat @4noura, Dr. Omid Safi @ostadjaan, Dr. Yasir Qadhi @YasirQadhi, Roger Waters @rogerwaters, Dr. Vijay Prashad @vijayprashad, Dr. Nader Hashemi @naderalihashemi, Mr. Craig Mokhiber @CraigMokhiber, Mr. Motasem Dalloul @AbujomaaGaza, Katie Halper @kthalps, Dr. Nidal Jboor, Medea Benjamin @medeabenjamin, Dr. Ashok Swain @ashoswai, @TurgayEvren1, Dr. Richard Falk, Dr. Ilan Pappe @pappe54, @SanaSaeed, Dr. @AssalRad, Dr. Tamara Sonn, Dr. Chandra Muzaffar, Dr. Junaid Ahmad @Academicatarms, State Senator @SaudAnwarCT, and many others from international civil society. Read and share the full letter below, led by the Community Alliance for Peace and Justice @Alliance4PJ, the Coalition to Change U.S. Policy on Pakistan (CUSP) @ChangePakPolicy, and Center for the Study of Islam and Decolonization.

    12K7.4K356204578K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20196.8x their median

    سلیکٹڈ کہنے والو سن لو! ہم 2023 میں بھی عمران خان کو ہی سلیکٹ کریں گے❤ #ڈیفیکٹڈ_اپوزیشن

    4.8K7231.1K80View on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    کل حکومت کے ساتھ مزاکرات اس لئے ناکام ہوا کیونکہ حکومت چاہتی تھی کہ پختونخواہ میں ہم اپنی من مانی کریں گے تو میں نے انکو بتایا کہ خیبر پختونخواہ میں عمران خان کی حکومت ہے یہاں پر راج عمران خان کا ہوگا تمہارا باپ بھی یہاں پر بند کمروں کے فیصلے مسلط نہیں کر سکتا!!! وزیراعلی سہیل آفریدی کا گنڈی چوک میں لانگ مارچ کے شرکاء سے خطاب

    7592270432K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 2026

    Press Release Islamabad: June 07, 2026 Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) strongly condemns the worst-ever electoral rigging, blatant attempts to manipulate results, and the open use of state machinery in various constituencies of Gilgit-Baltistan. According to initial results and unofficial counts, PTI candidates were clearly leading until 7 PM. However, immediately afterwards, results from specific polling stations began to emerge with suspiciously high turnouts exceeding 80%, and individual ballot boxes yielding 700 to 800 votes , figures that raise serious doubts and suspicions. This constitutes a shameful stain on the entire electoral process and its transparency. Furthermore, polling agents of PTI are being denied Form 46, a clear violation of election laws that has further intensified fears of result manipulation. In areas including Nagar and others, evidence has emerged of individuals from opposing parties being caught red handed with fake ballot papers. Reports indicate that some elements were apprehended in the act as early as morning, providing irrefutable proof that this rigging is part of a well planned and systematic conspiracy. PTI wishes to highlight that this rigging is not limited to polling day alone. The entire electoral exercise was made controversial even before polling through pre poll rigging. Voter lists were tampered with in specific constituencies, the same voters were added to multiple polling stations, police and administration were used to alter constituency delimitations and polling schemes, and opposition candidates and workers were systematically harassed and pressurized. All these actions prove that the Form 47 producing government has once again crossed every limit to steal the public mandate. PTI makes it clear that any attempt to manipulate the results will have serious consequences. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf will employ every constitutional, legal, and democratic avenue to protect the votes of its supporters. PTI demands that authentic results from all polling stations be released immediately, Form 45 and Form 46 be provided to every candidate without delay, a swift inquiry be conducted into suspicious polling stations with strict action against those responsible, and the Election Commission fulfill its constitutional duty by ensuring complete transparency. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf assures the people of Gilgit-Baltistan that their votes will be protected at all costs, and no one will be allowed to loot the public mandate. Issued by: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Central Media Department

    380140551148K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 2026

    PTI کے تمام کارکنان سے گزارش ہےکہ گلگت بلتستان کےانتخابات میں بھرپورجوش و جذبے کے ساتھ حصہ لیں اور عوام تک پارٹی کا پیغام پہنچائیں۔ اتحاد،نظم وضبط اورمثبت رویے کے ساتھ انتخابی مہم چلائیں تاکہ عوامی طاقت سے حقیقی تبدیلی کا سفر مزیدمضبوط ہو۔ ان شاء اللہ کامیابی عوام کی ہوگی۔

    8400352 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 990 interactions against 57K followers, an engagement rate of 1.73%. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 56.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Ayesha Khan's engagement rate on X?
Ayesha Khan (@iamAyeshaPTI) has an engagement rate of 1.73%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 57,138 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.73%, Ayesha Khan sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iamAyeshaPTI have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @iamAyeshaPTI post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going