Back to @iamAhmadshahzad's profile

Ahmad Shahzad πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° engagement report

@iamAhmadshahzad - 2.5M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.024%
of 2.5M followers
Per impression
2.85%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
0.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
601
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 601 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.831% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ahmadshahzadfoundation, #championssupportprogram, #championsoftomorrow.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #ahmadshahzadfoundation, #championssupportprogram, #championsoftomorrow.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ahmad Shahzad πŸ‡΅πŸ‡°'s engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.024%, Ahmad Shahzad πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 457 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 19, 202614x their median

    A statement knock by Babar Azam 100 off just 52 balls against Quetta Gladiators πŸ”₯ He dominated the spinners, played high risk shots with complete authority, and looked fearless throughout. This is a Babar without mental blocks, confident, aggressive, and in control. Credit to Ottis Gibson as well for his mentorship. The impact is clearly visible in this PSL πŸ’― #BabarAzam #psl

    7.6K44819437114K viewsView on X
  • Feb 10, 202612x their median

    Alhamdulillah πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° 2/2 for the team! Happy to contribute and grateful for the support. Let’s keep the momentum going πŸ’š https://t.co/3utyCD82hE

    6.6K28921020121K viewsView on X
  • Apr 1, 202610x their median

    7 T20 centuries in just last 15 months is an incredible effort 🫣😳 Another 55 balls century for Farhan. Certainly one of the hottest T20 player going around in the world ATM. Proud moment for pak πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° https://t.co/1gbeBHRFEO

    5.8K3291021457K viewsView on X
  • Feb 28, 20269.6x their median

    From talent to dominanceπŸ”₯Sahibzada Farhan now the highest run scorer in this World Cup! 🏏 Virat Kohli’s record broken. Pakistan’s superstar has arrived!πŸ’š Take a bow, champ! πŸ‘‘πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° #PAKvSL #sahibzadafarhan

    5.3K3121121574K viewsView on X
  • Feb 18, 20268.7x their median

    Outstanding knock by Sahibzada Farhan! πŸ’―πŸ”₯ A historic century in the T20 World Cup and now the 2nd Pakistani ever to achieve this milestone. I always believed in you and you proved your class to the world. Congratulations champion! πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° So so happy for your achievement.β™₯️ #PAKVSNAM #sahibzadafarhan

    4.8K24714824328K viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 20267.4x their median

    Pathetic cricket from Pakistan. Sad story of Pakistan cricket. Same old faces Same old results. Plz don’t fool the nation anymore πŸ™ still have time bring some positive changes in this WC. Fakhar Nafay Salman They should b playing now. #INDvsPAK #PAKvIND

    3.7K37932019105K viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 20265.7x their median

    Babar gone once again. May b it was his last Dance to prove his worth in this format. #INDvPAK #PAKvIND

    2.8K17237944136K viewsView on X
  • Feb 24, 20265.0x their median

    England weren’t even at their best. A very beatable side. Yet Pakistan missed a golden opportunity due to poor planning, poor shot selection & a confused Playing XI. 25 off 24 from Babar stalled the innings, then a reckless slog to finish it. Shadab badly leaked runs in the middle overs when pressure was needed the most. Saim Ayub’s continued no-show, Abrar ignored again and Nafay should’ve batted at 4. Costly mistakes. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° #PAKvsENG #T20WC2026

    2.5K17728824140K viewsView on X
  • Feb 28, 20264.8x their median

    Sahibzada Farhan creates history! πŸ’š Big stage. Big pressure. Bigger innings. πŸ’₯ Second T20 hundred in a World CupπŸ”₯When it mattered the most, he delivered like a champion.πŸ‘‘ Proud moment for Pakistan cricket! πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° #PAKvsSL #sahibzadafarhan

    2.7K13667539K viewsView on X
  • Mar 8, 20264.7x their median

    Congratulations to India on winning the T20 World Cup.πŸ† Phenomenal performances by Sanju Samson, Abhishek Sharma, Ishan Kishan, and Shivam Dube. A deserving champion that peaked at the right time, just as we said earlier. Meanwhile, look where world cricket stands and where our cricket is today. We keep beating Namibia, Uganda, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, and UAE to claim No.1, but struggle against the top teams. Four tournaments lost, and still no real change. #IndiaVsNewZealand #INDvsNZ #T20WorldCup2026final

    2.6K1411408114K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ahmadshahzadfoundation#championssupportprogram#championsoftomorrow#championsprogram

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 601 interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.831% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.3K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ahmadshahzadfoundation, #championssupportprogram, #championsoftomorrow.

What is Ahmad Shahzad πŸ‡΅πŸ‡°'s engagement rate on X?
Ahmad Shahzad πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° (@iamAhmadshahzad) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,539,546 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.024%, Ahmad Shahzad πŸ‡΅πŸ‡° sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iamAhmadshahzad have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iamAhmadshahzad post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going