IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency ⚛️ engagement report
@iaeaorg - 292K followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 0.702% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 62% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 101x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iaeagc, #iaeajobs, #istr2027.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #iaeagc, #iaeajobs, #istr2027.
Compared with accounts its own size
IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency ⚛️'s engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.021%, IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency ⚛️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 85% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 62% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 62% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 488 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 2026101x their median
The IAEA has confirmed that the tritium concentration in the 23rd batch of Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS)-treated water, which Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) commenced discharging today from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS), is far below Japan’s operational limit and consistent with international safety standards. Read more: https://t.co/0NS4q6WP6f
- Aug 20, 20269.9x their median
The IAEA has been informed that the 330 kV Ferosplavna-1 power line at the Zaporizhzhya NPP – the plant’s only remaining off-site power line - was disconnected at 00:44 local time today resulting in a new loss of off-site power. The location of the damage to the line was preliminarily assessed to be on the northern bank of the Dnipro River. An attempt to reconnect the line manually was unsuccessful and, due to ongoing military activity, technicians are currently unable to determine the cause of the outage. Emergency diesel generators automatically started up to power the plants vital safety systems. The IAEA team at the plant continues to assess the situation. Each loss of off-site power underscores the extremely fragile nuclear safety and security situation at the ZNPP, said DG @rafaelmgrossi, repeating his call for maximum restraint and protection of the plant’s external power supply.
- Aug 29, 20264.3x their median
The ZNPP has been without off-site power for more than a week and is currently relying on emergency diesel generators (EDGs) to provide the electricity needed for essential nuclear safety and security functions, IAEA Director General @rafaelmgrossi said today, underlining the importance of ensuring the site has sufficient diesel fuel available. https://t.co/dTVsA6NOO5
- Aug 18, 20264.3x their median
The IAEA has been informed that a drone exploded at a bus stop used by staff travelling to the Zaporizhzhya NPP at around 06:00 today. The ZNPP Director informed the IAEA team that the explosion caused 16 casualties among staff and subcontractors, including one death and three serious injuries, describing it as the worst event the plant has faced. The IAEA was further informed of attacks in the ZNPP industrial area. No nuclear safety or security damage was reported. DG @rafaelmgrossi solemnly calls on military commanders responsible for these actions as well as all others aiming on nuclear power plants and/or their staff to put an immediate stop to these unacceptable actions which are in absolute contradiction to the 7 pillars and the 5 principles and constitute great risks to nuclear safety and security during the conflict.
- Sep 5, 20263.4x their median
Another IAEA-brokered localized ceasefire has taken effect to enable power line repairs necessary for the restoration of off-site power to the Zaporizhzhya NPP after a long outage, DG @rafaelmgrossi announced today. Due to military activity on the northern side of the Dnipro River, the plant lost the connection to its sole remaining power line - the 330 kilovolt Ferosplavna-1 - on 20 August. Since then, the ZNPP has depended on emergency diesel generators to cool its six reactors and spent fuel pools. The plant is now running low on diesel fuel reserves and faces a possible station blackout within days unless off-site power is restored or more fuel reserves can be transported to the site, located in an active war zone. Under the temporary ceasefire around the damaged power line, Ukrainian technicians will begin power line repairs later today following demining of the area, DG Grossi said, adding that both sides had been engaging constructively with the IAEA for the sake of nuclear safety and security. An IAEA team will monitor the repairs during the ceasefire, the 7th that DG Grossi has negotiated as part of efforts to help prevent a nuclear accident during the conflict.
- Aug 28, 20263.4x their median
The IAEA has been informed of three drone incidents at the site of the Zaporizhzhya NPP earlier this week, underlining constant dangers to nuclear safety during the military conflict. One drone attack on 25 August reportedly occurred near the cooling pond, injuring two plant employees. The following day, another drone detonated on the site of the dry spent nuclear fuel storage while a third drone - also on 26 August - reportedly hit the sprinkling device of the ZNPP’s power units system. Radiation levels at the site remain normal. DG @rafaelmgrossi says any attack on NPP sites is unacceptable and calls again for maximum military restraint to avoid the risk of a nuclear accident.
- Aug 20, 20262.7x their median
Recent military activity around the ZNPP has underscored the continuing serious risks to nuclear safety and security at the site, with a deadly drone explosion affecting plant personnel this week and the plant today losing all external power, IAEA Director General @RafaelMGrossi said. https://t.co/T9Kxjr5jCf
- Aug 21, 20262.4x their median
The IAEA has rolled out an updated version of its Power Reactor Information System (PRIS), launching a new public webpage featuring optimized interactive PRIS Data Browser, providing faster, more intuitive access to trusted nuclear power reactor information from around the world. For more than five decades, PRIS has served as the IAEA's authoritative source of information on nuclear power reactors, supporting Member States, policymakers, regulators, utilities, researchers and the public with reliable data on reactor status, design characteristics, operating experience and global nuclear power development trends. Read more: https://t.co/qdszQ856JD
- Aug 26, 20262.1x their median
Pioneering nuclear solutions for shipping and offshore energy The Atomic Technologies Licensed for Applications at Sea (ATLAS) is an IAEA initiative bringing together the international nuclear and maritime communities to advance the deployment of innovative civilian nuclear applications at sea, specifically nuclear-powered ships and floating nuclear power plants (FNPPs). https://t.co/jMoccVw67S #AtlasIAEA #Atoms4Maritime
- Aug 28, 20262.1x their median
Launched in 2026, the Atomic Technologies Licensed for Applications at Sea (ATLAS) will operate in collaboration with the @IMOHQ to develop an international framework for the safe, secure and safeguarded use of civilian maritime nuclear applications. From nuclear-powered shipping to floating nuclear power plants that could provide low-carbon electricity for coastal and remote communities, ATLAS will help Member States explore innovative maritime applications while upholding the highest standards of nuclear safety, security and safeguards. Find out more: https://t.co/jMoccVw67S #AtlasIAEA #Atoms4Maritime
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 0.702% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 62% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 101x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iaeagc, #iaeajobs, #istr2027.
- What is IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency ⚛️'s engagement rate on X?
- IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency ⚛️ (@iaeaorg) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 291,931 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.021%, IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency ⚛️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @iaeaorg have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @iaeaorg post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.