Back to @i___guns's profile

القوة العسكرية engagement report

@i___guns - 400K followers on X

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.033%
of 400K followers
Per impression
0.377%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
8.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
132
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.07/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 132 interactions against 400K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.377% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 91 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #سناب_القوه_العسكريه.

Compared with accounts its own size

القوة العسكرية's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.033%, القوة العسكرية sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 84 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 202617x their median

    محسن رضائي: الى جميع الدول العربية والخليج العربي إذا حظرتم رحلاتنا الجوية و طبقتم الحظر الجوي فلن تكون مطاراتكم بمنأى عن الرد . تركيا وأذربيجان امتنعت عن استقبال الرحلات الإيرانية ، لكن النجس لا يقصد إلا دول الخليج https://t.co/3OZeIu1HfG

    1.2K42457240208K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20267.8x their median

    اضعاف دول الخليج هدف إسرائيلي ، وإيراني كذلك . من يشك في ذلك https://t.co/URo9PUvrjB

    74126320578K viewsView on X
  • Mar 6, 20247.4x their median

    الحمدلله تم الإنتهاء من برنامجي الرمضاني الأول . . رتويت فضلا لا أمرا . سلسلة من المعلومات الحصرية مع سعادة السفير رفعت الأنصاري . في #سناب_القوه_العسكريه 👇🏼👇🏼 https://t.co/oAOefy5Ot2 https://t.co/iAEPDaBthJ

    6762168019.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.5x their median

    غزة احتفلت باليوم الوطني السعودي https://t.co/R5L5KceZ6I

    512737040K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20264.2x their median

    خطاب رائع عن القضية الفلسطينية . لملك الأردن https://t.co/BrGlzsPahm

    456966063K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.7x their median

    أكثر دولتين تنطبق عليهم حيثيات اتفاق مكة .. هما الكويت ومصر . وأتوقع انضمامهما ولو بعد حين . الكويت مثلا فتحت مسارات التعاون الشامل مع تركيا وباكستان

    39435504265K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.6x their median

    بدأ الجد . . ونسأل الله أن ينصرنا على أذناب إيران

    4074915371K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.6x their median

    غدا سيتم الكشف عن خطة العقوبات الأشد في التاريخ ضد إيران ( من المتوقع الإعلان عن العقوبات التي ستطال من يتعامل مع إيران اقتصاديا ) . والصين استبدلت النفط الإيراني بالسعودي استباقا للعقوبات

    401616171K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.5x their median

    اللهم فرحنا بصنعاء كما فرحتنا بدمشق

    3836613038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.2x their median

    انسحاب وفود كثيرة ، عند كلمة النتن ياهو . شي جميل . . ونتنياهو يرد: إن بقي جبان لم ينسحب فليغادر الآن

    38029171105K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#سناب_القوه_العسكريه

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 132 interactions against 400K followers, an engagement rate of 0.033%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.377% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 91 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is القوة العسكرية's engagement rate on X?
القوة العسكرية (@i___guns) has an engagement rate of 0.033%, based on the median interactions across 91 original posts from the last 30 days against 399,749 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.033%, القوة العسكرية sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @i___guns have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @i___guns post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going