Back to @iRashidLatif68's profile

Rashid Latif | 🇵🇰 engagement report

@iRashidLatif68 - 357K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.121%
of 357K followers
Per impression
3.82%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
432
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 432 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.121%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #nccia.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rashid Latif | 🇵🇰's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.121%, Rashid Latif | 🇵🇰 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 339 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 20263.5x their median

    شیر کی ایک دن زندگی گیدڑ کی سو سالہ زندگی سے بہتر ہے ٹیپو سلطان

    1.3K13154621K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.4x their median

    Beautiful https://t.co/j5N4JzlZzk

    1.3K8926523K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.1x their median

    بنا رہا ہوں میں فہرست چھوٹے لوگوں کی۔ ملال یہ کہ بڑے نام اس میں آتے ہیں۔

    1.2K13233418K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.6x their median

    The behaviour of the BCCI and the Indian team has become impossible to defend. Again and again they have chosen bad sportsmanship over basic decency, and in doing so they are damaging international cricket. Twice now, Mohsin Naqvi was present, this time in Dubai to carry out his duty as ACC chairman and hand over the trophy. Twice the Indian team refused to take it from him. He stood his ground and remained undeterred on both occasions, while India's excuses have turned into a farce. It is a sham, and everyone can see it. Let us be honest about what is happening. Politically driven Indian teams are hurting the global game and destroying its ethics. A handshake and a trophy presentation are not political acts. They are the simple courtesies that separate sport from hostility. When a team throws these aside for political reasons, it is not making a brave stand. It is dragging cricket into a quarrel that has nothing to do with the game. The real failure, though, belongs to the ICC. By staying silent, by refusing to act, the game's own governing body is allowing this to continue. It is high time the ICC either penalises this conduct or resolves the issue properly. If it keeps looking away, the very fibre of cricket, its fairness, its dignity, its shared spirit, will be destroyed completely. Cricket can survive losses on the field. It cannot survive this hostility. https://t.co/TnPBBzXrPb

    90315468934K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.3x their median

    If the team had to be run by remote control, then why were Sarfaraz and Umar Gul sent? Why were the selection powers taken away from Gary Kirsten and Jason Gillespie? And if captain Babar Azam wasn’t listening, the captain should have been sacked — so why were Sarfaraz and Umar Gul sent back instead? Is Babar Azam the next target? @SarfarazA_54 @umargul_55 @babarazam258

    77217358517K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.0x their median

    Incredible Razaullah cameo sets England 130 https://t.co/K9Utv7DRDv

    810309211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.9x their median

    Brilliant Batting by Raza Ullah @thepindiz https://t.co/4e8uwCmqD2

    7374417412K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.8x their median

    Well played Maaz Sadaqat https://t.co/HPITSETAdF

    729327211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.7x their median

    Agha Jee Amazing Catch ❤️ https://t.co/dl18H2VI00

    690358212K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.5x their median

    Pakistan Cricket team first ever tour to South Africa 1993 and with Great Leader Nelson Mandela at Johannesburg. https://t.co/bPoW9LmEB7

    6143118011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nccia

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 432 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.121%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

What is Rashid Latif | 🇵🇰's engagement rate on X?
Rashid Latif | 🇵🇰 (@iRashidLatif68) has an engagement rate of 0.121%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 356,871 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.121%, Rashid Latif | 🇵🇰 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iRashidLatif68 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iRashidLatif68 post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going