Faridoon Shahryar engagement report
@iFaridoon - 230K followers on X
Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 230K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 159x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #sidharthshukla, #sidharthshuklaliveson.
Measured over 82 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #sidharthshukla, #sidharthshuklaliveson.
Compared with accounts its own size
Faridoon Shahryar's engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.005%, Faridoon Shahryar sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 88% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 26% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 26% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 347 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 2, 2026159x their median
Open Letter to Salman Khan Sir Salman Khan sir, please stop Maatrubhumi release. Something doesn’t seem right with the film. There seems to be a hesitation, an unsure element around it — and that is never a good sign. Your superstardom is intact. We saw it recently with the way a simple “Sonam, it’s done bro” blew up everywhere. That is Salman Khan’s aura. People look up to you. Your fans simply adore you. But those fans are desperately waiting for a film that JUSTIFIES that superstardom and aura. Unfortunately, a few of your recent films haven’t been able to do that. I understand you’ve had an incredibly tough time — security threats, your own health concerns and Salim sir’s health as well. But you’ve done the seemingly impossible in the past, and you can do it again. Your fans want the Salman Khan of Tiger Zinda Hai, Sultan and Bajrangi Bhaijaan. Filmmakers like Kabir Khan and Ali Abbas Zafar have shown how beautifully they can channel your superstardom, vulnerability and screen presence. Your fans want you to concentrate on ACTING and being SALMAN KHAN — and allow the best people to take care of casting, music and the other creative aspects of the film. Please take this constructively, sir. You know I have only love and affection for you, and I say this as someone who is also a huge fan. The aura is intact. The superstardom is intact. Now we need THE FILM. Lots of Love Faridoon
- Aug 28, 2026121x their median
The negative paid campaign against #Toxic is condemnable but the legal action is an over reaction on the part of the Toxic team. If a film has a 60% plus positive response then the movie will have long legs specially when it is headed by a big star but when the overwhelming public opinion is towards the negative side then nothing can save such a film. For me Toxic was a headache inducing experience. An overdose of misplaced testesterone fest that just doesnt make sense. Only relationship that gets an emotional response is between Yash and Nayanthara. Music is ordinary too. What is your opinion about Toxic?
- Aug 25, 2026116x their median
Stop targeting Kangana Ranaut, jalan ki bhi hadd hoti hai. Taapsee, Kangana is absolutely right when she says that Ashutosh Rana, Rakhi Sawant, Sonu Sood and Taapsee Pannu are not even 1% of what Kangana Ranaut is all about. Find out more... https://t.co/cibDz5eV2d
- Aug 27, 2026107x their median
Toxic is a boring film. After so much of hype, and after KGF 2, if you're going to deliver a boring film for the audience, it is nothing short of a sin. The main culprit is the disjointed screenplay. My question is: did you guys have test screenings of the film? Because if you had shown it to a select group of unbiased people, they would have surely told you what exactly was going wrong. Aamir Khan has always believed in test screenings (i am not talking about recent films). One of the reasons why his track record remained impeccable for such a long period in the past was because he would take feedback seriously and make as many corrections as possible before the actual release. Toxic was supposed to come with Dhurandhar 2. You guys had ample time for course correction, if required. Maybe that course correction simply did not happen. A three-hour film that bores the audience is a very bad idea. And please, Animal did not work at the box office merely because of its bold content. These are not the 1980s. Today, audiences have countless options to consume intimate content. Animal worked because the storytelling connected with the audience. The storytelling in Toxic is just not working. Whatever fantastic opening Toxic has received is, in my opinion, entirely because of Yash's massive stardom. But will that initial enthusiasm sustain once word of mouth takes over? I doubt it. What are your thoughts?
- Aug 29, 202667x their median
Toxic is a disaster but the paid negative campaign against the film is highly condemnable. There are some people within the film industry who seem to enjoy being commentators instead of concentrating on their own films. Their relevance is increasingly relegated to commenting on what is going right or wrong with the industry, while they remain hesitant and unsure about their own work. But here’s the larger point: no amount of negativity can stop a genuinely good film. Animal faced tremendous negativity, but alongside it were people proudly saying they had watched the film three, four, even five times. Once that wave of genuine audience excitement took over, nothing could stop the film from becoming a huge success. The same happened with Dhurandhar. Negative videos were made, criticism came from different quarters, but there was also a much bigger wave of people absolutely loving the film. When positive word of mouth becomes overwhelming, manufactured negativity simply cannot overpower it. Toxic, unfortunately, has a flawed and disjointed screenplay. It simply does not work for most parts. Yash is a superstar. He has acted well, and he is bound to learn from this experience. Everyone is allowed to fail. One unsuccessful film cannot take away what he has achieved, and I’m sure Yash will come back stronger. But as of now, Toxic is simply not working. That’s it. Your thoughts?
- Sep 9, 202638x their median
.@akshaykumar sir ka Brahmastra hai unka discipline. He is disciplined to a fault — and perhaps that is one of the biggest reasons why nothing can stop him. He wakes up at 4:30 in the morning and starts his day with exercise. I’ve personally interviewed him at 6:30 AM, 8 AM, 9 AM and 9:30 AM. He is punctual to a fault and approaches his work with remarkable method and consistency. For almost three decades, Akshay Kumar has routinely done four to five films a year. Even if two or three of them work, he remains firmly in the top league. He remains a superstar. What fascinates me is that the discipline hasn’t receded with success. Neither has his camaraderie with the people around him. He has consistently remained a people’s person and is immensely popular with his co-stars. He is also perhaps the one superstar who is completely secure and comfortable being part of big multi-starrers. Take The Jungle as a recent example. It’s a multi-starrer and a superhit — but take Akshay Kumar out of the equation and, for me, the film simply doesn’t work. He is the glue that binds it together. That’s Akshay Kumar’s strength. He is secure enough to let everyone shine, yet possesses the star power to bring grandeur and scale to any film he becomes a part of. And the way things are going, I genuinely see a very long career ahead for him — perhaps something on the lines of Mr. Amitabh Bachchan. Happy Birthday, Akshay Kumar Sir. Keep inspiring. Keep shining. And keep showing us what relentless discipline can achieve. ❤️
- Sep 4, 202629x their median
.@iamsrk aap mujhe mil len please, said Hania Aamir in a viral interaction with me in Toronto a couple of years back Her favourite SRK film? https://t.co/4rxRWoOVjg
- Sep 4, 202626x their median
Hugely talented Afghan singer @FarangisMusic is very impressed with @AmaalMallik and believes that is a great composer Farangis beautifully sings Tu Aata Hai Seene Mein from MS Dhoni composed by Amaal. Farangis also has wonderful things to say about @palakmuchhal3 who has originally sung this song. Farangis applauds the humanitarian work undertaken by Palak.
- Sep 22, 202623x their median
I miss working with @iamsrk , said @AnupamPKher in an incredible memorable conversation with me. This amazing conversation coming your way tomorrow 11 am IST. https://t.co/WDY7Dm3zSB
- Sep 30, 202622x their median
THE CAREER-BEST OPENING FIR AJAY DEVGN LOADING… DRISHYAM 3 set to clock ₹50Cr+ in India alone 🔥🔥 https://t.co/Yc6bvVaMIh
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 230K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 82 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 82 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 159x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #sidharthshukla, #sidharthshuklaliveson.
- What is Faridoon Shahryar's engagement rate on X?
- Faridoon Shahryar (@iFaridoon) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 82 original posts from the last 30 days against 230,174 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.005%, Faridoon Shahryar sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @iFaridoon have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @iFaridoon post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.23 posts per day across the measured window.