Back to @hugoclement's profile

Hugo Clément engagement report

@hugoclement - 640K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.078%
of 640K followers
Per impression
2.34%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
3.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
500
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 500 interactions against 640K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 957 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #gironde.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.078%, Hugo Clément sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 24, 20261.9x their median

    Il y a quelques temps, des journalistes me demandaient si je n’étais pas désespéré que « plus grand monde » ne s’intéresse au changement climatique. Je répondais qu’il s’agissait d’un rouleau compresseur avec une énorme inertie, imperméable aux débats sur les plateaux télé, qui allait de toute façon s’imposer à nous, avec la multiplication des événements extrêmes qui lui sont associés. Cette canicule historique en est un bon exemple. Et les décennies à venir seront pires. Le « backlash écologique » est un phénomène politico-médiatique éphémère. Le changement climatique, lui, est une réalité physique qui va bouleverser nos modes de vie et ceux de nos descendants, inéluctablement. On peut continuer à le relativiser autant qu’on veut, ça ne changera strictement rien. Nos deux seuls leviers possibles : essayer de l’atténuer (en participant à la nécessaire réduction mondiale des émissions de gaz à effet de serre) et s’adapter (dans la mesure du possible, car l’adaptation au-delà d’une certaine ampleur de réchauffement devient très compliquée). Être contre la climatisation n’a pas de sens. On ne peut pas être « contre » une technologie qui permet de réduire la mortalité durant les épisodes de chaleur extrême. Personne n’est contre le chauffage en hiver. Oui, il faut désormais climatiser les logements, comme le font tous les pays qui doivent affronter des températures extrêmes. En revanche, présenter cela comme l’unique adaptation au changement climatique, c’est un non-sens. Il faut aussi végétaliser massivement les espaces urbains, adapter nos bâtiments, transformer nos politiques d’aménagement, modifier certaines habitudes lors des fortes chaleurs (notamment les horaires de travail ou d’enseignement). Tout le monde finira par se rendre à l’évidence. La question est : quand ? En attendant, prenez soin de vous, et prenez des nouvelles de vos proches les plus fragiles. Courage.

    677141130979K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Merci la mairie de Paris, dit cet oiseau qui a perdu son nid au jardin du Mémorial. Dégoûté. https://t.co/DFSIaiVB0Q

    385151201921K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    La préfecture du Loiret refuse le report de la chasse au gibier d'eau demandé par la Ligue pour la protection des oiseaux malgré l'épisode de sécheresse qui touche le département https://t.co/k83dPJw9Oe

    1781799647130K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 2026

    🚴🔥 Pays Basque ce matin. https://t.co/BUnM9LdxhX

    1147609.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 2026

    Pour les personnes se rendant en Gironde pour proposer leur aide, message de la préfecture ⤵️ https://t.co/ZFH25idpFg

    37131021K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 2026

    Projet de loi d’urgence agricole : le Sénat revient sur la définition des zones humides pour en réduire le nombre https://t.co/8n1Xv94AwP

    1412529K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gironde

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 500 interactions against 640K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 957 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Hugo Clément's engagement rate on X?
Hugo Clément (@hugoclement) has an engagement rate of 0.078%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 639,540 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.078%, Hugo Clément sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @hugoclement have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @hugoclement post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going