Back to @httpsrealitys's profile

THIAGO. engagement report

@httpsrealitys - 88K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.43%
of 88K followers
Per impression
7.58%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
18.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.096%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 1.43%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 7.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 326K interactions, about 277x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tag: #separaonordestedocusil.

Compared with accounts its own size

THIAGO.'s engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.43%, THIAGO. sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 131 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026277x their median

    MILEY has officially removed Cyrus from her name and now shares last name with Zendaya, Beyoncé & Adele. https://t.co/NovPuevwxe

    314K10K87891516M viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026150x their median

    desculpa. é horrível o que eu vou falar, mas se esse canalha ganhar, eu espero que ele afunde o brasil a nível de miséria quem sabe assim alguns de vocês acordem.

    140K33K1.2K2.7K1.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202690x their median

    passando mal com essa matéria https://t.co/JRazD1yJjU

    94K11K466602675K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202688x their median

    Renan Santos já começou 👀👀👀 https://t.co/nud9pQel4o

    91K11K5641.6K1.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202640x their median

    O Lula venceu em TODOS os estados do Nordeste com o dobro dos votos do Flávio Bolsonaro. https://t.co/mAOJNY4eO9

    42K4.1K407602548K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202638x their median

    So quick witted. 💔 @DollyParton #DollyParton https://t.co/NoX3mDsjaf

    41K3.6K110192693K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202633x their median

    renata: só um pequeno intervalo e já voltamos... lula: ai, não acredito kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk passando mal. LULA NA GLOBO https://t.co/MLea87wuzE

    36K2.6K141287541K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202620x their median

    Eu me recuso a aceitar que o Lula perdeu VOTOS porque foi CONTRA essa porra de BETS. Namoral, essas pessoas merecem se afundar PIOR do que estavam. Eu não tenho pena alguma dessa gente, se fodam MUITO!

    19K4.3K10763163K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202618x their median

    No meio dessa tragédia inteira eu fiquei feliz que a Dani Balbi e o Rick Azevedo foram eleitos dep. estadual e dep. federal, respectivamente. Votei com gosto e não me arrependo! ❤️ https://t.co/bhSviBJ8wy

    17K3.5K82487123K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 202617x their median

    olha o engajamento dessa mulheeeeerrrr https://t.co/qMVvplgFsO

    18K1.2K2747106K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#separaonordestedocusil

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 1.43%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 7.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 326K interactions, about 277x its own typical post.

What is THIAGO.'s engagement rate on X?
THIAGO. (@httpsrealitys) has an engagement rate of 1.43%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 88,210 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.43%, THIAGO. sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @httpsrealitys have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @httpsrealitys post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going