Back to @hotpecs_'s profile

Hotpecs engagement report

@hotpecs_ - 240K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.191%
of 240K followers
Per impression
2.62%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
7.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
458
interactions (median)
Saved
0.865%
151 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 458 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.191%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hotpecs's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.191%, Hotpecs sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,691 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,485 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 178 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 17, 20258.2x their median

    WATCH THE FULL VIDEO HERE. WANT MORE? https://t.co/6wthpxymS8 https://t.co/fOTbDKTyfn

    3.1K656117328K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.9x their median

    He flies across the sky but beyond those clouds, he is powerless in his version of kryptonite. https://t.co/bdJkU1upKA https://t.co/GazUxUuM69

    1.1K2642021K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.9x their median

    He made sure his body always looked good, not just for himself but also for his roommate who is standing right outside the shower door. He’s on a mission to rid himself of his feelings but nothing is stronger than wanting the touch of another man worshiping every inch of his body. https://t.co/IaJX01CaeM

    1.2K1141041K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.9x their median

    You’ve already paid for his training services, it’s time to get your money’s worth. https://t.co/bdJkU1tRV2 https://t.co/C6YXXTFzmB

    7281222118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.7x their median

    Being this fit is the key to hotter opportunities. https://t.co/bdJkU1tRV2 https://t.co/4r26NML5dJ

    691910118K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.5x their median

    Being a fitness trainer has given him more than just a flexible work schedule or clients, but the ability to bend himself to become the hot piece of manmeat some of his client secretly desired from him. https://t.co/6wthpxymS8 https://t.co/nRV4Z8fUN3

    618710133K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 2026

    The master knew his muscleboy wanted to feel loved and appreciated. With a body built to serve the country, his muscleboy was eager to submit himself to find real freedom in masculine pleasure https://t.co/6wthpxxP2A https://t.co/7PkrIaUeEr

    615700032K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Curiosity never killed the cat because when they both found out they wanted just a taste of each other’s bodies, a new exciting relationship was born. https://t.co/bdJkU1upKA https://t.co/UIfGouDJLt

    526650017K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2026

    He yearned for his college roommate in a way he’s never felt before, so inside the shower he let his thoughts run wild; wishing and hoping for his love to come touch him and ruin him in unimaginable ways. https://t.co/6wthpxxP2A https://t.co/yUgpwmJ2hM

    521391025K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 2026

    He was used to control, desire, and lust, but after years of being the top rentboy of the area it was only about time he experienced this new kind of elevated experiences reserved for adonises like himself. https://t.co/6wthpxxP2A https://t.co/RpgceTyK4H

    484521026K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 458 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.191%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 2.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post.

What is Hotpecs's engagement rate on X?
Hotpecs (@hotpecs_) has an engagement rate of 0.191%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 240,218 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.191%, Hotpecs sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @hotpecs_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @hotpecs_ post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going