Raphael Honigsteinš engagement report
@honigstein - 412K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 412K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Posts are seen about 140K times each, and 0.139% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 299K interactions, about 2959x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #bvb.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.047%, Raphael Honigsteinš sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 2097 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 21, 20262959x their median
I was confident I could of played a major part this summer for my country after the season Iāve had. Iāve been left shocked and gutted by the decision. Iāve loved nothing more than putting that shirt on and representing my country over the years. I wish the players, all the best this summer š“ó §ó ¢ó „ó ®ó §ó æ
- Jul 17, 20268.2x their median
*Deep breath* š§µ Iāve re-watched game from 56mins to clear my heads on the different thoughts from varying voices + work out whether this was psychological meltdown that is on the players (English DNA)? Or was it Tuchel (TT) losing the plot? Or maybe a mix?
- Jul 20, 20265.9x their median
The amount of revisionism doing the rounds right now is incredible. During Germanyās best time (2010-2014), Lƶw OPENLY tried to emulate Spain and in tandem, Bayern re-emerged as an elite side thanks to Louis van Gaalās Ajax-Barca positional play. (1)
- Sep 2, 2026
šØ Ralf Rangnick on Manchester United still needing a left-back: āI remember being asked about Manchester United in 2020, before I ever worked there. I said, āThey could do with a left back. I know they have Luke Shaw, but Iām not sure he is still at the kind of level you need for a club like Manchester United.ā People interpreted that as me saying Luke Shaw was a bad player. I never said that. There is a difference between being a good player and being the standard Manchester United should be trying to reach in every position. When I eventually became the manager, I saw Luke every day. Technically he is good, physically he can be very good, he has experience. I told him: āLuke, you can absolutely play for this club. But Manchester United should have another left-back here who makes it very difficult for you to be the first choice every week.ā That was my opinion then. It hasnāt really changed. Look around Europe. If Manchester United tell me their ambition is to compete with the best teams in the Champions League, then I look at the players those teams have in these positions. Look at someone like Nuno Mendes. That is the level you have to look towards. Not because you need Nuno Mendes specifically, but because that should be your reference point. I remember when I spoke about the club needing open-heart surgery. My point wasnāt simply to sign many players. It was to raise the standard of the squad until there were no positions where the club was accepting something because it had become familiar. Six years have passed since that first interview. Manchester United have spent a lot of money, changed managers and replaced players in almost every area of the pitch, and weāre still having the same conversation about left-back. For me, Luke can still have a role. If you have a top level left back and Luke Shaw competing with him, you have very good depth. But if Luke Shaw is still your undisputed first choice and youāre still asking whether Manchester United need to sign a left-back, then I would say the question I raised in 2020 was never really answered.ā
- Jun 16, 2026
Deschamps-Sufferball, we have missed you.
- Jul 24, 2026
One day, Iād like to see a Christopher Nolan film where I can make out the dialogue. (Amazing, even so)
- Apr 28, 2026
boring
- Jul 6, 2026
Tuchelās England winning a key World Cup match with a classic 4-4-2 formation oop.
- Jul 11, 2026
Haaland senior š
- Jul 14, 2026
DouĆ©ās shot sums it up
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 412K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Posts are seen about 140K times each, and 0.139% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 299K interactions, about 2959x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Raphael Honigsteinš's engagement rate on X?
- Raphael Honigsteinš (@honigstein) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 412,446 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.047%, Raphael Honigsteinš sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @honigstein have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @honigstein post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.