Back to @honigstein's profile

Raphael HonigsteinšŸ’™ engagement report

@honigstein - 412K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.047%
of 412K followers
Per impression
0.139%
140K views on a typical post
Reach
33.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
194
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.43/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 412K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Posts are seen about 140K times each, and 0.139% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 299K interactions, about 2959x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #bvb.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, Raphael HonigsteinšŸ’™ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 2097 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 21, 20262959x their median

    I was confident I could of played a major part this summer for my country after the season I’ve had. I’ve been left shocked and gutted by the decision. I’ve loved nothing more than putting that shirt on and representing my country over the years. I wish the players, all the best this summer šŸ“ó §ó ¢ó „ó ®ó §ó æ

    263K20K10K6.0K19M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20268.2x their median

    *Deep breath* 🧵 I’ve re-watched game from 56mins to clear my heads on the different thoughts from varying voices + work out whether this was psychological meltdown that is on the players (English DNA)? Or was it Tuchel (TT) losing the plot? Or maybe a mix?

    1.2K16614285673K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20265.9x their median

    The amount of revisionism doing the rounds right now is incredible. During Germany’s best time (2010-2014), Lƶw OPENLY tried to emulate Spain and in tandem, Bayern re-emerged as an elite side thanks to Louis van Gaal’s Ajax-Barca positional play. (1)

    1.0K832718261K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    🚨 Ralf Rangnick on Manchester United still needing a left-back: ā€œI remember being asked about Manchester United in 2020, before I ever worked there. I said, ā€˜They could do with a left back. I know they have Luke Shaw, but I’m not sure he is still at the kind of level you need for a club like Manchester United.’ People interpreted that as me saying Luke Shaw was a bad player. I never said that. There is a difference between being a good player and being the standard Manchester United should be trying to reach in every position. When I eventually became the manager, I saw Luke every day. Technically he is good, physically he can be very good, he has experience. I told him: ā€˜Luke, you can absolutely play for this club. But Manchester United should have another left-back here who makes it very difficult for you to be the first choice every week.’ That was my opinion then. It hasn’t really changed. Look around Europe. If Manchester United tell me their ambition is to compete with the best teams in the Champions League, then I look at the players those teams have in these positions. Look at someone like Nuno Mendes. That is the level you have to look towards. Not because you need Nuno Mendes specifically, but because that should be your reference point. I remember when I spoke about the club needing open-heart surgery. My point wasn’t simply to sign many players. It was to raise the standard of the squad until there were no positions where the club was accepting something because it had become familiar. Six years have passed since that first interview. Manchester United have spent a lot of money, changed managers and replaced players in almost every area of the pitch, and we’re still having the same conversation about left-back. For me, Luke can still have a role. If you have a top level left back and Luke Shaw competing with him, you have very good depth. But if Luke Shaw is still your undisputed first choice and you’re still asking whether Manchester United need to sign a left-back, then I would say the question I raised in 2020 was never really answered.ā€

    16612124140K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 2026

    Deschamps-Sufferball, we have missed you.

    119156324K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026

    One day, I’d like to see a Christopher Nolan film where I can make out the dialogue. (Amazing, even so)

    98314251K viewsView on X
  • Apr 28, 2026

    boring

    8827119K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 2026

    Tuchel’s England winning a key World Cup match with a classic 4-4-2 formation oop.

    8044041K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 2026

    Haaland senior šŸ˜‚

    7116129K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026

    Doué’s shot sums it up

    6083025K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bvb

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 412K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Posts are seen about 140K times each, and 0.139% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 299K interactions, about 2959x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Raphael HonigsteinšŸ’™'s engagement rate on X?
Raphael HonigsteinšŸ’™ (@honigstein) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 412,446 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, Raphael HonigsteinšŸ’™ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @honigstein have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @honigstein post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going