Back to @historyinmemes's profile

Historic Vids engagement report

@historyinmemes - 6.1M followers on X

Measured over 358 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 6.1M followers
Per impression
0.565%
189K views on a typical post
Reach
3.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.076%
144 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
14.27/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 6.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 358 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 189K times each, and 0.565% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 14.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 358 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 90K interactions, about 84x its own typical post.

Measured over 358 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Historic Vids's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Historic Vids sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 921 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 202684x their median

    A Virginia man accidentally left his phone recording while undergoing anesthesia for a colonoscopy. The audio captured medical staff insulting him, telling an assistant to lie to him, and discussing adding a false hemorrhoid diagnosis to his medical records. In 2015, a jury awarded him $500,000 in damages. The patient, referred to in court documents as “D.B.,” underwent a colonoscopy in Reston, Virginia, in April 2013. Before receiving anesthesia, he activated his phone’s audio recorder to capture the post-procedure instructions. The device remained in his clothing beneath the operating table, unintentionally recording everything that happened during the procedure. While listening to the recording on his way home, he discovered that anesthesiologist Dr. Tiffany Ingham had repeatedly mocked him while he was unconscious. She ridiculed his fear of needles, made insulting remarks about a rash he had mentioned, and said she had wanted to punch him following their conversation before the procedure. The audio also revealed medical staff discussing ways to avoid interacting with him afterward. An assistant was told to falsely claim that the doctor had already spoken to him and that he simply couldn’t remember. Ingham was also heard discussing adding hemorrhoids to his medical records, despite no evidence of the condition being found. The patient subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging defamation and medical malpractice. Following a three-day trial, a Fairfax County jury awarded him $500,000: $100,000 for defamation, $200,000 for medical malpractice, and $200,000 in punitive damages. One juror later remarked that the defense had little room to dispute the allegations because the entire conversation had been captured on the recording.

    78K10K1.9K6664.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202659x their median

    Ladder 3 was one of the first firefighter units to show up at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Sadly, its crew perished in the collapse of the North Tower. Their truck is now displayed in the NYC Memorial. https://t.co/3hAcdD8iNg

    58K4.5K14043974K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202641x their median

    Saving Private Ryan hides one of its most powerful details amid the chaos. While medics desperately work to save another wounded soldier, one man quietly tends to his own injury before carrying on. It’s a brief moment that captures the brutal reality of war—sometimes there’s no time to stop, even when you’re the one bleeding.

    41K2.3K2531179.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202631x their median

    The exact moment a Russian billionaire realized he wasn’t the one calling the shots. In 2009, Vladimir Putin visited the struggling Russian town of Pikalyovo, where he publicly confronted billionaire businessman Oleg Deripaska during a deepening economic crisis. With factories shut down and workers left without pay, Putin demanded that Deripaska sign an agreement to restart production and restore operations. In front of television cameras, Putin pushed a pen toward him and insisted he sign the document immediately. Deripaska complied, creating one of the most memorable political confrontations of the time. The exchange quickly became a powerful demonstration of the Kremlin’s authority over Russia’s wealthiest businessmen. Beyond the economic dispute, the televised confrontation sent a clear message: even the country’s most influential billionaires were ultimately subject to Putin’s power.

    28K3.9K5042601.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202630x their median

    In 2026, a Reddit user captured the final moments of his aging PlayStation 2 as its graphics processor failed in the middle of a race. The yellow car on a coastal track began dissolving into broken polygons and visual glitches before the screen eventually collapsed into solid color bars. The decades-old console kept rendering until its final frame, giving its owner one last spectacular, glitch-filled farewell after more than 20 years of gaming.

    29K2.3K411123924K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202628x their median

    While filming Daredevil (2003), Colin Farrell’s character, Bullseye, was supposed to irritate a sleeping woman before killing her with a peanut. But Farrell decided to improvise, unexpectedly kissing her to capture a genuine reaction. Her priceless response turned the serious moment into a hilarious behind-the-scenes blooper, proving that sometimes the funniest moments are the ones nobody planned.

    28K1.4K107322.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202623x their median

    For 10 years, an elderly man listened to a voicemail from his late wife every day. When the message was accidentally deleted, 11 telecom engineers spent three days working to recover it. In 2015, Stan Beaton of England lost a 12-year-old voicemail greeting from his late wife, Ruby, after a Virgin Media system upgrade. Devastated by the loss, he contacted the company. Moved by his story, 11 engineers spent three days searching back-end servers for the audio file and eventually recovered it.

    23K1.5K10556631K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202623x their median

    “Not to punish evil is equivalent to authorizing it.” - Leonardo da Vinci https://t.co/5PfMFZzrYN

    19K5.0K132237261K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202622x their median

    While filming The Last Samurai, Tom Cruise had a real steel katana swung just inches from his neck—no CGI involved. Hiroyuki Sanada brought the blade toward Cruise at full speed before stopping it incredibly close. Cruise barely reacted, putting complete trust in Sanada’s martial arts training and precision, which made the scene feel even more intense and authentic.

    21K1.4K228921.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202621x their median

    In 2021, Beatriz Flamini entered a silent cave and remained isolated for 500 days. Without sunlight or normal cues to track time, she completely lost her sense of its passage, emerging convinced that only about 160 days had gone by—more than a year less than the reality. https://t.co/6ApsU6XmRU

    21K737128743.9M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 6.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 358 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 189K times each, and 0.565% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 14.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 358 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 90K interactions, about 84x its own typical post.

What is Historic Vids's engagement rate on X?
Historic Vids (@historyinmemes) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 358 original posts from the last 30 days against 6,087,666 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Historic Vids sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @historyinmemes have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @historyinmemes post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 14.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going