Back to @hfc_x6's profile

ماكس الهلالي engagement report

@hfc_x6 - 333K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.051%
of 333K followers
Per impression
0.392%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
13.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
169
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
21 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 169 interactions against 333K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.392% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #النصر.

Compared with accounts its own size

ماكس الهلالي's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.051%, ماكس الهلالي sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202622x their median

    🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 بمناسبة فوز الهلال وصدارة الدوري سحب على 500 ريال لـ فايز واحد والتحويل فوري .. الشروط جدًا بسيطة رتويت لهذه التغريدة 🔄 متابعة- @Nabd_tuwaiiq السحب موثق وبالتوفيق للجميع طبقوا الشروط 💙 https://t.co/MhpcoxjW5C

    8512.3K533664K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.4x their median

    عينكم على سافيتش ونيفيز مع الحكم https://t.co/JTTcLdRFSG

    1.3K626917202K viewsView on X
  • Nov 9, 20177.0x their median

    الاتحاد السعودي: اثبتت الجهات المختصة دخول مبلغ 8.5 مليون ريال لحساب اللاعب محمد العويس، دفعة منها عن طريق تركي الزهراني الذي تلقى المبلغ من لاعب الاهلي تيسير الجاسم

    4756553027View on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.1x their median

    شفيه انصدم من شكله 💀💀💀💀💀 https://t.co/9sd8H3i0ad

    9713123270K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.4x their median

    الاتحاد دون ملكية خاصة ولايزال تحت الصندوق بشكل كامل ويخلص صفقات كبيرة ( الوضع صمت ولا احد يتكلم ) على العكس تماما الهلال وبالرغم ان الهلال يعلن من تكفل بالصفقة ، ليش الاختلاف بينهم ؟

    48216984445K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.5x their median

    كان منتظرهم يضحكون https://t.co/ZMQ6fjE9BF

    5012549878K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.9x their median

    لا اله إلا الله https://t.co/L4pmqEXMvy

    3719919478K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20262.6x their median

    🚨عاااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااااجل نقل قمة النصر والهلال في دوري روشن 2026 -2027 من الأول بارك إلى مدينة الملك فهد الرياضية بحلتها الجديدة. لتكون المواجهة المنتظرة هي الحدث الأول الذي يدشن جاهزية الملعب رسمياً بعد الصيانة. @Nabdtuwaiq 🔗 https://t.co/q4eLm5l9mt

    324594218432K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨💣💣💣💣💣 لمن فاته تصريح الامير نواف بن سعد بعد المباراة ويؤكد ان النادي مستمر بملاحقة المسيئين بالقانون 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/C3eKIFX7rU

    351746125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.5x their median

    🚨 عبدالله الكعبي : 🇦🇪 البعض يقول لك ليش الدوري السعودي يجيب لاعبيين كبار ويصرف عليهم مبالغ ، وش دخلك ؟ هذا مشروع كبير تبي تتابع او اتركهم منت مجبور بالعكس من حقهم اخوانّا السعوديين ونتابعهم ونشجعهم https://t.co/drW1dqNzmo

    339772043K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#النصر

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 169 interactions against 333K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.392% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is ماكس الهلالي's engagement rate on X?
ماكس الهلالي (@hfc_x6) has an engagement rate of 0.051%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 332,708 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.051%, ماكس الهلالي sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @hfc_x6 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @hfc_x6 post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going