Back to @heyadam_ai's profile

Adam engagement report

@heyadam_ai - 158K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 158K followers
Per impression
0.763%
4.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 842 interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Adam's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Adam sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 375 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 202623x their median

    CLAUDE CAN FIX YOUR ENTIRE FINANCIAL SITUATION IN JUST ONE WEEKEND. Here are 10 prompts to help you build wealth from scratch:

    727104101248K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.3x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: People are using Claude to build income streamsโ€ฆ in days. Not months. Not years. Just prompts. Here are 7 you can copy ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿงต

    194272242K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.1x their median

    CANCELLED NETFLIX. CANCELLED AMAZON PRIME. CANCELLED HULU. No more $19.99 each month. ChatGPT transformed my laptop into a free streaming center. Here are 7 prompts to create this system:

    64121015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20261.5x their median

    The interesting thing about GPT-6 Astra + CapCut PC isn't what either one can do alone. It's that Astra can take over the repetitive editing work, while CapCut PC turns that automation into an editable workflow. That's a much bigger efficiency gain than simply adding another AI feature. #GPT6Astra #CapCutPC

    221121060K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    ๐ŸšจRIP CAPCUT GOOGLE GEMINI CAN NOW EDIT YOUR VIDEOS FOR YOU AND MAKE AMAZING CONTENT IN SECONDS HERE ARE 10 PROMPTS THAT DO IT ALL: ๐Ÿ‘‡

    3112215.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    It doesn't ask Blender and AI to do the same job. GPT-6 Astra handles geometry. Blender handles structure and composition. The Dreamina Clay Renderer Plugin handles the one-click transfer. Seedance 2.5 handles the final render. The camera and layout stay locked when the clay model moves into Dreamina, so you keep the precision of 3D while exploring new visual styles faster. The competitive pricing of Seedance 2.5 and 2.0 makes that experimentation even more accessible. Worth trying. #Dreamina #DreaminaPartner

    17818036K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    "One thing I like about this workflow is that the color grade can start before Iโ€™ve completely locked the edit. GPT-6 Astra lets me translate a visual direction into a custom .cube LUT. Then I can bring that LUT into CapCut PC and use it as a visual reference while shaping the footage. Now Iโ€™m not just correcting colors at the end. Iโ€™m thinking about what the entire sequence should feel like. CapCut PC still gives me the final control over how the grade is applied and refined, while Astra makes it faster to explore the initial visual language. That makes color feel more connected to the creative direction. #GPT6Astra #CapCutPC #AIVideo #Seedance25"

    18814050K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    All Paid Courses (Free for First 4500 People) ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—˜ (PART - 1) 1. Artificial Intelligence 2. Machine Learning 3. Prompt Engineering 4. Claude,Chatgpt,Grok 5. Data Analytics 6. AWS Certified 7. Data Science 8. BIG DATA 9. Python 10. Ethical Hacking (72 Hours only ) Like + RT + comment ' Drive ' Must Follow me so I can DM you.

    248402.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Making money with Canva is your lottery ticket to financial freedom. Like and comment 'Canva' and I'll send you the FREE step-by-step guide. You must be following me to receive DM now. FREE for the next 24 hours only. https://t.co/HbqjTuHGVW

    228603.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    "Maybe AI gives creators a new kind of filmmaking freedom: The freedom to change their mind later. Instead of needing every decision to be perfect before production, you can establish the spatial foundation with GPT-6 Astra, define the camera and character paths in the Viewport, manually move the scene into CapCut PC, generate with Seedance 2.5, and then keep experimenting in post with Edit Pilot. The workflow becomes flexible without becoming completely directionless. And that raises an interesting question: Is creative freedom about having unlimited optionsโ€”or being able to revise your decisions without starting over? #GPT6Astra #AIVideo #Seedance25 #CapCutPC"

    16810036K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 842 interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is Adam's engagement rate on X?
Adam (@heyadam_ai) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 158,115 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Adam sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @heyadam_ai have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @heyadam_ai post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going