PlayerSells
Back to @health_com_'s profile

Health engagement report

@health_com_ - 3.2M followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 3.2M followers
Per impression
0.158%
3.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0.053%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.158% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Health's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Health sits below the 10th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.006%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link100% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%8.9K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 169 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 20263.7x their median

    The healthiest eggs you can buy are pasture-raised eggs. They contain more antioxidants, omega-3s, and vitamins A and E than other egg types. https://t.co/MlegQ6Gau6

    175004.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.2x their median

    Could your morning scramble make for healthier bones? New research suggests eating two eggs each day could be linked to better bone mineral density. https://t.co/if7wEJ9z3W

    145004.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.7x their median

    Gaining muscle and losing fat at the same time can be done, but it takes planning and hard work. Find out what you need to do to achieve success. https://t.co/mGbPXKIpAA

    133004.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.3x their median

    The benefits of pistachios include antioxidant properties and improved heart and digestive health. They can also help manage blood sugar levels. https://t.co/YknfDCmXbp

    85104.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.3x their median

    Potatoes have long gotten a bad rap for raising blood sugar levels. But it turns out the spud's cooking method may make a difference for diabetes risk. Here's what new research found. https://t.co/Lr3pK6khSt

    103104.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.3x their median

    A new study linked daily coffee consumption with a lower risk of liver disease, liver cancer, and liver-related death. https://t.co/wtCU1YvYRf

    75203.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.2x their median

    The best bodyweight exercises targeting the core include functional, full-core training exercises like the dead bug, bird dog, plank, and more. https://t.co/KXhw4b8Wvf

    111104.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.8x their median

    Millions of Americans drink coffee every day, but what does the morning ritual actually do to your health? Experts explain. https://t.co/vFS8KziU7M

    101004.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.8x their median

    Research shows that eating fruit at specific times and pairing fruit with other foods may benefit weight loss and blood sugar management. https://t.co/a0lT9du5Aw

    73013.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.8x their median

    Walking speed isn’t just about fitness—it’s a powerful indicator of overall health, longevity, and independence. Learn what your pace says about you and how to improve it. https://t.co/M0WE1XMGbM

    100103.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.158% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is Health's engagement rate on X?
Health (@health_com_) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,162,574 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Health sits below the 10th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @health_com_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @health_com_ post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going