Back to @haze0x's profile

Haze 𝓰𝓶𝓰𝓷𝓪𝓲 engagement report

@haze0x - 140K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.085%
of 140K followers
Per impression
0.462%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
18.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
120
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 140K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.462% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Haze 𝓰𝓶𝓰𝓷𝓪𝓲's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.085%, Haze 𝓰𝓶𝓰𝓷𝓪𝓲 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 134 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 20268.5x their median

    left my house to go get an energy drink while i was on stream and came back to +$45k!!! bang. https://t.co/ZGl1yMgEdB

    9291663764K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20265.3x their median

    📱Product "GMGN GO" ON THE WAY.

    4502112534124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20264.0x their median

    thank u crypto. https://t.co/75ZgzzZpTf

    3649104644K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.5x their median

    岗位招聘: 3名中英文客户运营 职责: 1、快速的1V1回复,及时响应用户提出的问题,提升用户的服务口碑。 2、处理客户投诉。 3、保持在线时长,做到长时间的活跃。比如说在群里也跟大家聊聊天之类的。 4、针对复杂的产品问题,特别是高频用户的性能问题,交易问题,进行远程连线,协调研发,产品参与,快速定位与解决问题。 5、服从公司安排的新工作调配。 希望你是: E人,特别E。爱聊,爱交朋友。 脾气稳定,P小将都比较抽象,时不时爱骂几句,但人都不坏。所以希望你脾气稳定点,别跟用户对喷。 中英文流利。我们不仅仅只有华语用户。 熟练使用GMGN,如果你自己不打狗,不用GMGN,那就别来应聘了。 在线时间长,我每天在线时间早8至晚12或者凌晨1。 具备道德感和原则,别搞些乱七八糟的,伤害用户利益。 可以远程,高于行业同岗位的薪酬。 有兴趣直接给我发邮件吧 [email protected]

    2329165881K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.7x their median

    JUST IN: GMGN flips PumpFun and Hyperliquid in 24 hour revenue

    23522412261K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.0x their median

    💳GMGN CARD 已经上线。 免开卡费/年费 1%消费返现 5%活期理财 第一版本还有待优化的地方: 1、目前不支持订阅AI。 2、Google pay 支持使用,但还不支持GMGN卡的皮肤。 https://t.co/iEHhH5EcRf

    1158114540K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.0x their median

    在川普时代,GMGN是数据分析驱动的PVE交易。 当时我们的PVP体验是很差的。导致后来PVP版本出现以后,大量的用户骂我们不懂交易,脱离版本,产品体验垃圾。 于是我们顶着每次更新必被骂的心理压力,开始学习PVP版本,包括我自己投入大量的时间在战壕里。 那是去年4月到10月份的半年,被骂的最狠的2周,推特都不敢点开看。那个时候很多人觉得GMGN就要死了。 10月份因为我们提前对多链的支持以及对PVP产品的体验改进,我们达到了历史的数据巅峰,在数据看板上,我们的单日收入是整个区块链链上协议的历史第七大单日收入。 从那以后,GMGN一直是链上交易量最大的、用户400万并覆盖全球区域的多端多链交易平台。 如今,GMGN网页端还是有许多小毛病需要我们持续改进和迭代,不能有任何的懈怠,APP也正在进行版本改进,我们推出新的版本,做我们该做的事情,改进其中的交易与产品体验。 第一个版本,我们会把页面改进。 第二个版本,我们会上线对齐当前市场水平的交易体验。 第三个版本,我们会上线领先市场水平的交易体验。 一切,将在未来30天内发生。 GMGN GO,Let's fucking go!

    166369326K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20261.9x their median

    刚才审核通过了一张绿色卡片。 https://t.co/BExOlqisRf

    1143107593K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.9x their median

    即将上线付费Callout。 199u一次,看看实力。

    1071109861K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.8x their median

    打开Notion的历史版本功能,突然看到我2024年9月写的一段产品思考。 产品的诞生确实是需要时机。 https://t.co/RMJBpaRl1w

    162548641K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 140K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.462% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

What is Haze 𝓰𝓶𝓰𝓷𝓪𝓲's engagement rate on X?
Haze 𝓰𝓶𝓰𝓷𝓪𝓲 (@haze0x) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 139,918 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.085%, Haze 𝓰𝓶𝓰𝓷𝓪𝓲 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @haze0x have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @haze0x post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going