Back to @haydenzadams's profile

Hayden Adams 🦄 engagement report

@haydenzadams - 2.4M followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.016%
of 2.4M followers
Per impression
0.647%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
2.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
384
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 384 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.647% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 119K interactions, about 218x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Hayden Adams 🦄 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 182 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 29, 2025218x their median

    wealth managers putting your money in an index fund https://t.co/StHHYx8Gf7

    111K6.6K8426616.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202622x their median

    We’ve written an FAQ to answer some of the questions we've received about watermarking. In summary: • We’re implementing watermarking to comply with the EU AI Act. Other major model developers have signed the same Code of Practice and will also be implementing watermarking; • Our watermarking method doesn’t have any practical impact on the quality or content of Claude’s outputs; • The difference between watermarked and un-watermarked text will not be distinguishable to readers; • Nothing is added to the text and there are no hidden characters; • Watermarking doesn’t require extra tokens, and will not be more expensive; • Watermarks can’t be traced to a specific person, organization, or chat. Read more: https://t.co/G76iUOJ7Hu

    4.8K6781.9K1.2K11M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202614x their median

    Countdown starts now https://t.co/9fqa8AnC7U https://t.co/ez6yBMKqAN

    3.7K4857764671.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20268.8x their median

    Some bangers from the SEC today: 1) buybacks do not make a commodity token into a security 2) liquid staking tokens for commodities are not securities https://t.co/kkRNqT3den

    2.8K37711698433K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20264.8x their median

    gonna be another ~hour appreciate the patience and stay tuned

    1.2K9746161207K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.5x their median

    Uniswap doing almost $2b in 24hr volume on robinhood chain is absolutely insane Huge growth in tokenized stocks especially https://t.co/UdTq4EG8zc

    1.1K9913026109K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.5x their median

    A malicious hook doesn't need a UI to scam you. 👉 It just needs to look like the best quote. After analyzing over 84,000 v4 hooks, we determined only 19% of hooks to be safe. It's time to get real about hooks. https://t.co/bhbBOvocJg

    903117104201630K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.4x their median

    Fudders out in force with various narratives based more on bags then truth Meanwhile $150m traded on https://t.co/kZ4CsDjQfy before it even launched Still in beta and getting way more traffic then expected so ui has some rough spots but they’ll be fixed soon 🐸

    8558033338123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.9x their median

    Everyone in my replies right now https://t.co/2scLLhI6dS

    6243640438110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.8x their median

    smol announcement test tokens while building Pools no longer carry any creator fee path back to Uniswap Labs all creator fees (past and future) now route to a programmatic buyback and burn: fees release as ETH, and anyone can claim that ETH by burning the token

    6959121663326K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 384 interactions against 2.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 0.647% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 119K interactions, about 218x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Hayden Adams 🦄's engagement rate on X?
Hayden Adams 🦄 (@haydenzadams) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,400,750 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Hayden Adams 🦄 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @haydenzadams have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @haydenzadams post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going