Back to @hatoyamayukio's profile

鳩山友紀夫(由紀夫)Yukio Hatoyama engagement report

@hatoyamayukio - 734K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.156%
of 734K followers
Per impression
3.56%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
4.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.108%
35 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 734K followers, an engagement rate of 0.156%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

鳩山友紀夫(由紀夫)Yukio Hatoyama's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.156%, 鳩山友紀夫(由紀夫)Yukio Hatoyama sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 142 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 15, 202627x their median

    アメリカとイランが戦闘終結に合意したと発表された。覚書の中で一番気になる文言は、米国及び同盟国がイラン復興のために少なくとも3000億ドル(48兆円)の計画の提示とあることだ。イラン戦争に反対した欧州の国々より、トランプに抱きついていた高市首相の日本が払うことになる懸念だ。絶対に反対だ。

    15K6.0K307314468K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 20267.6x their median

    かつて心臓を痛めて毎日十数種類の薬を頂戴しているかかりつけの医者から、ナフサ入手困難の影響で、近日中に薬の1回分ずつの分包ができなくなるとの連絡をいただいた。こんな細かなとこまでイラン戦争の影響が出ている。政府は大丈夫だ大丈夫だばかりだが、もっと腰を入れてイランと交渉をすべきだ。

    15K5.0K517180319K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20266.9x their median

    村上誠一郎前総務大臣は、高市政権の政策を推進する勉強会「国力研究会」について、「大政翼賛会のような会で全くナンセンス」と、参加を否定した。彼にはかつて離党を勧めたことがあるが、「あんたのような人たちが離党したので、自民党がおかしくなったんだ」と怒られた。村上水軍健在なり。

    16K3.8K6983241.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 202618x their median

    トランプ大統領は高市首相の名前が言えずパールハーバー・レディと呼んだようですね。日本政府は抗議したのでしょうか。また、記者会見で隣りのゼレンスキーのことをプーチンと呼んでいましたし、ジャパン・イスラム共和国からミサイル発射とイランを日本と呼んでいました。お歳を取られたようですね。

    16K3.9K315211378K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 202616x their median

    国民の多くは愛子内親王が次の天皇陛下に相応しい方だと理解している。皇室典範改正に当たって、天皇陛下は国民の理解が得られるように希望すると発言されていたが、陛下のお気持ちを無視して、男系男子優先に皇室典範が改悪された。暴挙である。国民の理解が得られるのは男女の別なく長子優先である。

    12K3.0K1.9K9251.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202616x their median

    海外に旅行に行かれた方々から、物価が高くてかなわなかったと言う声をよく聞くようになった。それもその筈、日本円の購買力が歴史的に最低水準に落ち込んでいるのだ。過去最高の1995年5月に比べ円の価値は3分の1に、6年前に比べても3分の2に下がっている。日本円をここまで弱くした責任は政府にある。

    13K3.7K588192329K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 202620x their median

    ホルムズ海峡に多くの船舶が通航できずに留まっています。イラン大使の話では、船ごとに日本政府の要請があれば調査して通すとのことですが、政府からの要請はあまりないようです。諸物価の高騰を抑えるためにも、政府がイランに要請するように署名をお願い申し上げます。 https://t.co/O49cw6QJ5M

    10K5.1K458219437K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 202612x their median

    日大の名誉教授の百地章氏は、国民の中には愛子天皇を期待する者もいるが、アイドルと同じ次元で考えてはいけないと述べている。愛子内親王のお人柄や識見などから相応しいと期待しているのであって、単にアイドル的人気で期待しているのではない。むしろそのような言い方こそ失礼ではないか。

    11K2.6K342151166K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 202612x their median

    首藤信彦君から話を聞いた。旧宮家・養子問題はすべて国民は法の下に平等であり、社会的身分や門地で差別されず、華族制度は認めないとする憲法14条違反であると。さらに、天皇は国民の総意に基かねばならないが、女性天皇排除の皇室典範改正法案は国民の総意ではないと。まさにその通りである。

    10K3.0K14582136K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202611x their median

    赤旗が2014年の集団的自衛権行使容認の議論の際、外務省は米国を使って、自衛隊の兵站活動を戦闘地域でも可能なように安倍首相を翻意させたことを明らかにした。私の政権のとき、外務省は「最低でも県外」を主張する私の言うことを聞くなと米国に伝えていた。外務省は米国を使って政権を操るのだ。

    8.2K4.0K247160381K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 734K followers, an engagement rate of 0.156%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 3.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is 鳩山友紀夫(由紀夫)Yukio Hatoyama's engagement rate on X?
鳩山友紀夫(由紀夫)Yukio Hatoyama (@hatoyamayukio) has an engagement rate of 0.156%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 734,284 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.156%, 鳩山友紀夫(由紀夫)Yukio Hatoyama sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @hatoyamayukio have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @hatoyamayukio post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going