Back to @hashjenni's profile

Jenni engagement report

@hashjenni - 207K followers on X

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.064%
of 207K followers
Per impression
1.88%
7.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
132
interactions (median)
Saved
0.071%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 132 interactions against 207K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 1.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 142K interactions, about 1076x its own typical post.

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jenni's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.064%, Jenni sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,881 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 125 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 20261076x their median

    More than three million pages from the Epstein files are now public. Cannibalism. Rape. Murder. Pedophilia. Not a single arrest. Not a single investigation. How cruel world we are living in. https://t.co/BRHN1Wc3jo

    98K42K1.5K8281.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026663x their median

    remember when the epstein files came out and showed the whole world there are rich elites who rape, kill, & eat babies then nothing happened?

    75K12K288105756K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026291x their median

    The audacity of politicians to say that “No one wants socialism” while enjoying free healthcare, pensions, and lifetime salaries is wild.

    32K6.0K16966216K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026287x their median

    Cuba is suffering because of U.S. sanctions, not because of socialism

    31K5.6K1.6K176497K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026142x their median

    Who tf decided we need to wake up early, get dressed, drive somewhere, and work for 8 hours just to afford being alive?? 😭

    16K1.7K79383251K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202689x their median

    Are there any jobs that don’t involve preying on the lower and middle class? I want to prey on the upper class

    10K623554193381K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202685x their median

    The Great Depression was only 25% unemployment rate. Right now we are at a 40% unemployment rate. Let that sink in.

    9.6K1.4K20923230K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202673x their median

    A four-day workweek with livable wages would improve everyone's mental health!!!

    8.7K865891685K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202649x their median

    So basically we’re all just working to buy gas. No food, no coffee, no medications, no life just gas. I hate it here.

    5.8K4441961256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202648x their median

    job hunting while burnt out because your current workplace has completely sucked the life out of you is truly a -10/10 experience, i must say

    5.3K9062877148K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 132 interactions against 207K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 1.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 142K interactions, about 1076x its own typical post.

What is Jenni's engagement rate on X?
Jenni (@hashjenni) has an engagement rate of 0.064%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 207,116 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.064%, Jenni sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @hashjenni have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @hashjenni post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going