Back to @hamusoku's profile

ハム速 engagement report

@hamusoku - 385K followers on X

Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.085%
of 385K followers
Per impression
0.658%
50K views on a typical post
Reach
12.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
326
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.7/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 326 interactions against 385K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 0.658% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 110x its own typical post.

Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ハム速's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.085%, ハム速 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video10% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link92% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 10% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 92% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 85 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 2026110x their median

    中国共産党が『淫夢』を宗教団体に認定 野獣先輩が教祖化される 中国淫夢民「おっそうだな」 https://t.co/S8Nc3wEF4S

    29K5.6K3471.3K9.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202662x their median

    【外資】シェラトン鹿児島さん 九州ふっこう応援割に合わせて宿泊費を2倍に値上げ 税金チューチュー目的がバレて炎上中 https://t.co/KaaDjTDs1v

    16K3.5K2253941.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202652x their median

    【沖縄県知事選挙】玉城デニーが公職選挙法違反←なぜか許される テレビ局も公選法違反動画をそのまま流す https://t.co/mMF1sC8QY3

    13K3.9K14489173K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202646x their median

    ガーナ人「生活保護くれ!人工透析治療を無料でやらせろ!」最高裁「外国人への生活保護は却下」敗訴確定 https://t.co/RalJkFcJDk

    13K1.5K257118397K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202646x their median

    ヨドバシカメラ池袋店の連続脱糞犯 特定された可能性 https://t.co/jYKbHavfRy

    12K2.3K1633612.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202642x their median

    駆け込みで夏らしいことした☀️ https://t.co/laZwKrfNti

    12K4951921.1K4.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202641x their median

    反日VIVANT女優・キムラ緑子さん テロリスト山上徹也を支持するパヨク思想を垂れ流していてキモ過ぎると話題に https://t.co/34PWPdszZg

    12K1.5K15990535K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202637x their median

    【裏金大好き】中道改革連合 政党助成金11億7000万円を受け取りつつ分裂するゴミクズムーブを披露 https://t.co/11JMJHGuhg

    9.5K2.3K136106177K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202636x their median

    タイムズカーのガバガバセキュリティにより免許証画像をダークウェブに流され人生終わった・・・補償せずに逃げようとするタイムズカーに対し集団訴訟の動き始まる https://t.co/mmW9w6DPda

    9.4K1.9K122130992K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202634x their median

    ハートオブビースト 嗚咽するかと思うほど泣いた。 ブラピが助演の映画だった。 犬は死にません。 https://t.co/QMGCAmzBUP

    9.0K1.4K114475456K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 326 interactions against 385K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 0.658% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 110x its own typical post.

What is ハム速's engagement rate on X?
ハム速 (@hamusoku) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 73 original posts from the last 30 days against 384,523 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.085%, ハム速 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @hamusoku have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @hamusoku post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going