Back to @halconada's profile

Hugo Alconada Mon engagement report

@halconada - 683K followers on X

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.091%
of 683K followers
Per impression
2.94%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
3.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
621
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.53/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 621 interactions against 683K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.94% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.8K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Hugo Alconada Mon's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.091%, Hugo Alconada Mon sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 251 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202613x their median

    El ministro de Economía, Luis Caputo, es el funcionario más rico del gabinete. Y mientras urge a los argentinos a sacar sus ahorros del colchón, mantiene el 95% de su dinero en el exterior https://t.co/Wq4bdRu6tf

    4.4K2.3K917158126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202610x their median

    Más de $33.000 millones del fondo fiduciario que sólo debe financiar rutas fueron girados a provincias durante las semanas de votaciones clave del Congreso para el Gobierno. En algunos casos, más del 90% de lo cobrado en el año llegó en esas “ventanas” legislativas. ¿Casualidad o patrón? Link a la investigación: https://t.co/fXEHrvwCZJ

    4.1K2.0K172166108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20269.8x their median

    Quisieron asesinarla. Ahora cuenta lo que sabe: "Hablamos de su exesposa y el tema de Andis. Cerimedo me contó que ellos sí filtraron los audios. Yo le dije que ella era una corrupta. El me dijo que ella [Natalia Basil] no era corrupta porque fue ella quien filtró los audios para parar la corrupción de Milei y su hermana”, https://t.co/wDMl5bcFuY

    4.0K1.8K20574167K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20267.6x their median

    1/8 🚨 $33.786 millones. Tres votaciones clave en el Congreso. Y una coincidencia que llama la atención. El fondo fiduciario creado para financiar rutas aceleró sus desembolsos justamente en las sesiones legislativas sensibles para el Gobierno. La documentación oficial permite reconstruir la secuencia. Link a la nota: https://t.co/fXEHrvwCZJ

    3.1K1.4K859886K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.6x their median

    El celular de Cerimedo puede haber abierto una caja de Pandora. Una nota habla de “eliminar” a Nadia Beller. Al lado, una billetera cripto. Detrás: una cuenta que movió US$1,38 millones. ¿Quién manejaba el dinero? La investigación que sacude Bolivia e incomoda en la Argentina: https://t.co/J5kFck0JYJ

    3.1K1.5K833891K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.3x their median

    🚨 Una factura, dos pagos. Precios hasta 20 veces más caros que en el PAMI. Y sobreprecios de hasta 4239%. Antes de renunciar, el interventor de Discapacidad llevó a la Justicia informes que apuntan a cómo se compraba en la Andis. Los documentos, acá 👇 (Un texto con @GrimaldiIgnacio) https://t.co/eZXxoVU9Pe

    2.7K1.7K718153K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.0x their median

    Durante 2026, el presidente Javier Milei visitó apenas 4 provincias y 11 países. Y desde que asumió, hace ya 32 meses, todavía no viajó a nueve provincias. Link a la nota: https://t.co/DKuovpasQB https://t.co/oeLCbDfxrI

    2.3K8631.0K11491K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.6x their median

    “Fernando me dijo que la hermana de Milei estaba involucrada con la corrupción”, dice Nadia Beller, embarazada de cuatro meses, de Cerimedo. https://t.co/u6rV4pYrAv

    2.4K934719108183K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20266.3x their median

    Rutas a cambio de votos en el Congreso: El Ministerio de Economía repartió $33.000 millones de un fondo fiduciario entre ciertas provincias durante sesiones legislativas clave para el Gobierno https://t.co/JkURUJXldX https://t.co/WPgevTsjqX

    2.5K1.3K1129278K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.8x their median

    🚨 La defensa de Adorni no cierra. Expertos detectaron dos posibles inconsistencias en su relato sobre las operaciones con criptomonedas y calificaron de inverosímil una parte clave de su explicación. Además, surge una pista para identificar a un comprador misterioso. 👇 https://t.co/o2z7khLIVh

    2.4K9711724061K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 621 interactions against 683K followers, an engagement rate of 0.091%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.94% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.8K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Hugo Alconada Mon's engagement rate on X?
Hugo Alconada Mon (@halconada) has an engagement rate of 0.091%, based on the median interactions across 67 original posts from the last 30 days against 683,396 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.091%, Hugo Alconada Mon sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @halconada have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @halconada post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going