Back to @haha_cd6's profile

Ha Ha Clinton-Dix engagement report

@haha_cd6 - 244K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.274%
of 244K followers
Per impression
4.01%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
6.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
668
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.5/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 668 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.274%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 4.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 10.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gopackgo, #bama, #onwisconsin.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #gopackgo, #bama, #onwisconsin.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ha Ha Clinton-Dix's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.274%, Ha Ha Clinton-Dix sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.671%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,130 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 153 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 202610.0x their median

    Emmanuel Acho carries himself like he’s better than people or more accomplished than them because a certain group of people have led him to believe he’s “one of the good ones.”

    5.9K6217344924K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20265.8x their median

    OMG. 😳 @JoshFord888 📺: ESPN https://t.co/0c9BdRMxwS

    3.1K6403888287K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.7x their median

    .@AlabamaFTBL fan Tommy Ray of Huntsville, AL is attending his 689th consecutive Bama game today. A single game ticket buyer, Tommy’s streak started 54 years ago. He has attended over half the games in the history of the UA football program. #RollTideTommy #Bama https://t.co/e2QByhcLVs

    2.3K1284017220K viewsView on X
  • Jan 7, 20263.3x their median

    #NewProfilePic https://t.co/s1b9JGb3QB

    2.0K825613169K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.8x their median

    Jordan Love/Matthew Golden with the first big play of the day — 45-yard deep ball TD between Buddha Baker and Denzel Burke.

    1.8K581221150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.0x their median

    Alabama names Luke Metz a starting ILB. Metz has seen his stock rise throughout fall camp. Was told he ‘was calling out where the play was going before it happened’ and ‘was coming downhill’ violently in scrimmages. https://t.co/sY9o0DCfe1 https://t.co/6y1l0OVLqS

    1.2K802436344K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.8x their median

    Lotzier Brooks loves his alternate special teams number 51 https://t.co/tRPj6k1JYu

    1.1K3896124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.6x their median

    What a great start. Roll tide Roll. ❤️🐘

    99362219.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Keelon Russell exits after first win as starter. https://t.co/I3rP2K63bO

    793210117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    If you’re not already, do me a favor and follow @TheTundraGB for all the latest clips on the Packers and show information! I see the falcon fans are on my neck. I don’t want any problems but it’s GO PACK GO for life over here.

    4811029017K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gopackgo#bama#onwisconsin#rolltide#rolltidetommy

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 668 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.274%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 4.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 10.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gopackgo, #bama, #onwisconsin.

What is Ha Ha Clinton-Dix's engagement rate on X?
Ha Ha Clinton-Dix (@haha_cd6) has an engagement rate of 0.274%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 244,385 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.274%, Ha Ha Clinton-Dix sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @haha_cd6 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @haha_cd6 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going