Back to @haaretzcom's profile

Haaretz.com engagement report

@haaretzcom - 597K followers on X

Measured over 84 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 597K followers
Per impression
0.324%
5.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.83/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 597K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 84 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 0.324% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.904% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 84 posts sampled, 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 238x its own typical post.

Measured over 84 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Haaretz.com's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Haaretz.com sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video1% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link99% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 1% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 107 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 2026238x their median

    Over 200 Israeli filmmakers sign petition supporting the creators of 'NAZA' https://t.co/rKfqk6G9pQ

    3.1K1.1K826168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026163x their median

    Editorial | Israelis must finally confront what Israel has done in Gaza https://t.co/bxD4oxLjSn

    2.0K74913574184K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026117x their median

    U2's Bono compares Ben-Gvir to Nazi Himmler over Gaza rhetoric https://t.co/SU5e5KSctv

    1.5K336121127719K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202689x their median

    Israel's elections committee votes to bar all Arab parties https://t.co/XbY33PtJuV

    654534161255169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202674x their median

    IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir instructed the army's top legal adviser on Monday to examine possible legal action against the filmmakers behind the documentary "NAZA," despite not having seen the film in full. According to Zamir, the film "is an attack on the State of Israel," and the military "will not allow IDF soldiers to be made targets through lies and blood libels" and will use "every tool at our disposal" against it | @lizarozovsky @yanivkub

    55640922713597K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202673x their median

    Israel halted supply of water to Gaza amid ongoing desalination crisis https://t.co/AmEqCNY53w

    621566547952K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202671x their median

    Thousands are held in Israeli torture camps. This is what happens inside https://t.co/DK0uZXiO2y

    619552366327K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202641x their median

    'Piece of shit': U.S. senator urges Ben-Gvir ban after emaciated-prisoner video https://t.co/Nv5po06Tc4

    52616433818K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202631x their median

    Netherlands to boycott Eurovision for second year over Israel's participation https://t.co/lCI5gxDIWY

    4548025312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202630x their median

    Israel razes homes in three West Bank villages, displacing 109 Palestinians https://t.co/6MWPZWwc1v

    263238153215K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 597K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 84 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 0.324% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.904% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 84 posts sampled, 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 238x its own typical post.

What is Haaretz.com's engagement rate on X?
Haaretz.com (@haaretzcom) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 84 original posts from the last 30 days against 596,956 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Haaretz.com sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @haaretzcom have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @haaretzcom post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going