Back to @h5LPyKL7TP6jjop's profile

老司机 engagement report

@h5LPyKL7TP6jjop - 395K followers on X

Measured over 115 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.03%
of 395K followers
Per impression
0.903%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
120
interactions (median)
Saved
0.045%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.97/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 395K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 115 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.903% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 115 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

Measured over 115 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

老司机's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.03%, 老司机 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 13, 201956x their median

    批评是批评家天生的使命!他们只感知对错,信奉真理,指出真相不吐不快,不在意权势和群众的喜好,从批评里不可能获得任何好处,但批评家愚直不改。在中国几乎所有人都讨厌批评家,喜欢阴谋家,因为他们只说好听的!可是就因为中国的批评家太少,中国几乎看不到未来和希望!

    3.4K1.2K2.0K61View on X
  • Sep 23, 202616x their median

    动画解析东方大国的特别国情…… https://t.co/4O8WYpRKDn

    1.5K16024510146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20268.0x their median

    广东也开始乱来了!中山一企业投了钱、缴了费,把地养熟,政府无偿收走,一转手卖了近7个亿,原投资者却分不到一杯羹。无偿收储可以,但收的是谁的权益,得说清楚。招商引资讲的是信用,今天这样对民企,明天谁还敢来? 网友:今天先抢了再说,哪还管什么明天! https://t.co/tBQpVvuZy2

    740144699208K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20267.3x their median

    虽然西藏洪灾没有救到一个人!但警告你,已经抓了十个发帖造谣的了!怎么样,就问你怕不怕? https://t.co/bttGbwsO8p

    656122901058K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.1x their median

    浦东机场查出国“吓死人” 一航班半数人禁止登机 离北京出入境新规正式实施只剩下不到一个月,一名网友突然爆料:8月18日他从上海浦东机场飞往西雅图,办理登机时被要求填写一份内容惊人的出境登记表。更夸张的是,旅客被要求交出手机,检查聊天软件和社交媒体。结果同一航班竟然有一半旅客被拦下。如果情况属实,浦东机场究竟发生了什么? 9月15日之后出入境究竟会发生什么变化,已经成为越来越多中国人密切关注的焦点! 1、出境航班被拦下一半人!浦东机场动手了? 随着中共新的出入境管理规定距离9月15日正式实施越来越近,关于“出境越来越难”的各种消息,也开始在网络上密集出现。 最新,一位网友在社交平台发帖写道,8月18日从上海浦东机场搭乘航班前往西雅图,经历了一场让他“吓死人”的出境审查。帖子写道,17:24起飞,换登机牌时,机场工作人员要我填写出境信息表,完全没有隐私,写信息的时候,同航班好多人都僵住了,卡在表格这。目测同机的人有一半禁止登机,起飞时座位空了一半,一片哀嚎声。我前面有个人在被问话中,查看他手机、社交媒体、聊天软件,没发现任何问题也被扣了,不让飞。警察说了,这个手机APP都是新装日期,是备用机,你常用手机呢?那个人支支吾吾彻底慌了,被带走了。到我的时候,首先问我是如实填写的吗?我回答是,然后把我手机和其他20个人的手机,要求解锁,一批拿去小黑屋过人工和机器!帖子迅速引发关注。 这个帖子之所以迅速引发关注,真正刺激公众神经的,并不只是“到底有多少人没能登机”,而是一个更大的问题:出境到底什么时候开始,变成了对个人手机、社交账号和私人信息的全面审查? 按照着这名网友晒出的一份《上海浦东国际机场出境登记表》,表格要求填写的内容包括个人基本信息、出境目的、行程信息等;更加敏感的是,还涉及家庭成员情况。包括配偶姓名、身份证、工作职务,子女姓名、出生日期、学校、国籍,甚至父母、岳父母、公婆、兄弟姐妹等信息。在境外关系一栏,还要求填写境外身份、境外亲友等情况。 更加引发争议的是所谓“网络与社交媒体”栏目,据称涉及海外社交媒体账号、互联网行为、常用浏览器、服务器、境外网站等信息,甚至还有个人资产情况。 如果这份表格确实是在机场大规模使用,那么问题就非常值得追问:一个普通人出境,为什么需要把自己、配偶、子女、父母、亲属、海外关系、网络行为乃至个人资产,全部交代清楚?这已经不是简单的“查护照”了,它真正触及的,是个人隐私和出境自由的边界。 海外时评人士罗翔认为,正常的出境安全检查当然可以理解,但如果要求旅客填写大量个人信息,逐一检查手机,甚至查看社交媒体和聊天软件,那么就必须有明确的法律依据、清晰的操作程序以及有效监督。否则,所谓“安全检查”一旦失去边界,就很容易从必要的安全措施变成对个人隐私的过度干预。尤其让普通人感到无助的是:一个人明明已经买好了机票,办理了登机手续,到了最后一刻却突然被拦下。你甚至不知道自己究竟违反了什么规定。更不知道,到底是谁决定不让你走,又有没有申诉和救济的渠道。 就在这个帖子出现之前,另一名网友也自称在深圳出境时遭遇审查。他表示,自己过去10年出入境一直没有发生问题,这一次却突然被带进一个很小的房间。工作人员要求他把背包和手机放在桌上,不能手拿,也不能讲话,两名工作人员站在门口盯着他十几分钟。他询问自己到底出了什么问题,对方只回答两个字:审查。十几分钟后,他被告知可以出境。这名网友感慨,自己40年前入籍时就已经放弃中国国籍,因此认为对方没有理由扣住自己,但这次经历仍然让他感到害怕,并表示以后“不回国了”。 如果这些个案属实,那么它们至少说明一个问题:现在越来越多人开始担心的,已经不是“怎么出去”,而是“还能不能出去”。而这个焦虑,又恰好发生在9月15日新的《关于出境入境管理的规定》即将实施之 评论人士“中美对标”认为,这次官方的出境入境管理规定,与旧规相比,最重要的变化,不是怎样让你更方便地出国,而是怎样不让你走。真正让人焦虑的不是纸面上多了十九条,而是过去被散落在不同法律里的边控权,终于被连接成了一张网。正如一位网友评论,这两个月,先是限制资金外流,然后限制技术外流,追海外收入税,现在肉身也限制了。出不去的基本都出不去了,无论是钱还是人,只能闷在国内,耳畔响起一声响彻天空的喝斥“缴枪不杀”。 (资源来自《文学城》)

    60712411411111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20266.4x their median

    电影想利用爱国赚钱,人们不买票了。游戏想利用爱国赚钱,被举报了。宣传爱国怎么一下就成了狗屎气味,人们都开始远离? 网友回复笑死了: https://t.co/8IpzcXG4mp

    583581221162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20266.2x their median

    俄军前线开始崩溃,乌军使用数个反坦克地雷硬核拆楼活埋俄军! 巷战攻坚有多残暴?俄乌前线再次刷新认知!乌军在清扫一处藏有俄军的地下室时,直接搬出了苏联老牌“大杀器”——TM-62反坦克地雷。 这玩意儿内装7.5公斤高爆炸药,原本是用来瘫痪重型装甲的,结果在近距离地下室攻坚中被当成简易拆楼炸药,直接顺着通道甩了进去!伴随一声轰鸣,封闭空间内的巨大冲击波瞬间引爆,整栋高层建筑的局部结构当场坍塌。 用这种暴力拆楼式的攻坚打法将侵略者埋葬!

    6695217155K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20266.2x their median

    中共一边立法,一边违法!根本就是一个笑话!发一个通知就能入户调查?调查个毛!关百姓屁事!真的就这么无法无天? 网民一齐炸了!回复全是拒绝! https://t.co/elcHfKjIFA

    551741086164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20265.3x their median

    15个俄军士兵在战场上最后录像视频,不明白冒死进攻占领这些废墟的意义,为此已经在这里死亡1200多人!只准进攻不准后退,要求追责团长。可怜的炮灰们至死都没明白是普京让它们送命! https://t.co/FDmM5XcO6u

    5277129390K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20265.2x their median

    举国体制最终毁于官场文化,重点扶持不如全家培养! 最让中共闹心的是爱国热情忽然风向大变:仇日情绪变成热烈祝贺日本夺冠,再无人骂张家是叛徒。因为报国无门,宁走他乡,天生我才必有用,自由世界出人才! https://t.co/Vwr5OHdDSr

    55226481119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 395K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 115 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.903% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 115 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

What is 老司机's engagement rate on X?
老司机 (@h5LPyKL7TP6jjop) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 115 original posts from the last 30 days against 395,222 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.03%, 老司机 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @h5LPyKL7TP6jjop have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @h5LPyKL7TP6jjop post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going