Back to @gzhdigital's profile

GZH engagement report

@gzhdigital - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 736 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.245%
3.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
26.03/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 736 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.245% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.309% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 26 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 736 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 93% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 1270x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dofatoaovoto, #conteudodemarca.

Measured over 736 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #dofatoaovoto, #conteudodemarca.

Compared with accounts its own size

GZH's engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, GZH sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video15% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link93% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 15% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 93% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 121 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 20261270x their median

    OPINIÃO PAULO GERMANO 💬 "Aceito perder uma eleição. O que não aceito é perder, junto com ela, o direito de tentar vencer a próxima." https://t.co/cRDazerlUQ

    6.5K1.4K2.0K179376K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026491x their median

    Lula tem 46,4% e Flávio Bolsonaro 44,6%, aponta Vox Brasil https://t.co/u4gSlS1eMM

    3.0K3545591889K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026443x their median

    Confira a charge de Fraga desta terça-feira. Veja outras em https://t.co/7cq6K1v9rG https://t.co/gB3aA5Bt7E

    3.0K4201013542K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026252x their median

    Justiça determina que Manuela remova fake news contra Van Hattem https://t.co/MokR4QOzKh

    1.7K1541141656K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026199x their median

    Candidatos ao governo do Rio Grande do Sul, Juliana Brizola (PDT) e Luciano Zucco (PL) se cumprimentaram na manhã deste domingo (4), primeiro turno das eleições 2026. Os dois se encontraram na PUCRS, em Porto Alegre, após concederem entrevista à Rádio Gaúcha. https://t.co/fVetw5WNJV

    1.2K5077279425K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026160x their median

    Giane Guerra | Supermercados gaúchos cogitam fechar aos domingos com o fim da escala 6x1 https://t.co/5fzWFjG9qD

    44819516297253K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026139x their median

    Senador do RS é o único a votar contra PEC do fim da escala 6x1 https://t.co/yPeWQKhCBU

    60010528512035K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026135x their median

    Lula tem 44,2% das intenções de voto e Flávio, 42,7% no segundo turno, aponta Vox Brasil #dofatoaovoto https://t.co/bM3BbzSgKq

    685952821928K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 2026130x their median

    Advogado amigo de Flávio Bolsonaro operou R$ 5 bilhões com bets em 2025 https://t.co/Fk2PujStDs

    5742182341310K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026122x their median

    Flávio Bolsonaro viajou dos EUA ao Brasil em jato de empresa de Vorcaro usado por Moraes https://t.co/wnPzZWK92j

    732114120814K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dofatoaovoto#conteudodemarca

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 736 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.245% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.309% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 26 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 736 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 93% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 1270x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dofatoaovoto, #conteudodemarca.

What is GZH's engagement rate on X?
GZH (@gzhdigital) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 736 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,058,106 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, GZH sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gzhdigital have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @gzhdigital post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 26.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going