Back to @gvadalvpev's profile

guadalupe ᥫ᭡ engagement report

@gvadalvpev - 44K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.19%
of 44K followers
Per impression
2.86%
2.9K views on a typical post
Reach
6.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
83
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 83 interactions against 44K followers, an engagement rate of 0.19%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 21,875 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 2.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 33x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mffl, #gopackgo.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #mffl, #gopackgo.

Compared with accounts its own size

guadalupe ᥫ᭡'s engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,875 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.19%, guadalupe ᥫ᭡ sits above the 50th percentile of the 219,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.149% to 0.706%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.706%
p902.63%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 219,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,696 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.706%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 65 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 19, 202633x their median

    Me watching my Packer receivers drop the beautiful touchdowns Jordan Love is giving them. 🫩 https://t.co/2sjJ8Rl66u

    2.4K335161928K viewsView on X
  • Oct 26, 202623x their median

    ☁️🖤 https://t.co/RlKG0j43bC

    1.9K2320019K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20264.9x their median

    Jordan Love is officially in the prime of his career.

    358133449.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20262.2x their median

    LAKERS WIN AND STAY UNDEFEATED 😭😭💕💕💕 https://t.co/vMIKqj8K94

    15820214.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 2026

    I do not support MAGA, but seeing that people are mad for the fact that Catholic priests and bishops went to the oval house to pray for Trump is crazy. As Catholics, we pray for EVERYONE. Jesus himself prayed for his prosecutors and enemies. Do not forget that Jesus IS the way, the truth, and the life.

    1083305.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 29, 2026

    Yay Mavs did it again 🫶🏼

    804202.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    How bout them cowgirls 🤣

    750503.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 2026

    Real Madrid cooked Barca with this last goal ngl

    461202.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    Nooooo not Kraft again 😭😭😭😭

    240102.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2026

    GOLDEN PLEASE

    200002.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mffl#gopackgo

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 83 interactions against 44K followers, an engagement rate of 0.19%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 21,875 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 2.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 33x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mffl, #gopackgo.

What is guadalupe ᥫ᭡'s engagement rate on X?
guadalupe ᥫ᭡ (@gvadalvpev) has an engagement rate of 0.19%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 43,684 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.19%, guadalupe ᥫ᭡ sits above the 50th percentile of the 219,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gvadalvpev have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,875 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @gvadalvpev post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going