Back to @gustavosacy's profile

Sacy engagement report

@gustavosacy - 365K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.511%
of 365K followers
Per impression
3.39%
55K views on a typical post
Reach
15.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 365K followers, an engagement rate of 0.511%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 3.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.8K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tag: #valorantchampions.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sacy's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.511%, Sacy sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,839 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,058 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 1, 20265.2x their median

    Bugou o telão e apareceu aspas de Phoenix, Zekken de Cypher e Tex de Neon TCK DESESPERADO E SACY EM CHOQUE KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK https://t.co/rB6NyxIPZG

    9.2K4745968656K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20264.8x their median

    Acredito que to no melhor momento da minha vida depois de tanto caos Familia bem, vendo amigos conquistando as coisas, trabalho fluindo, eu e sof morando na nossa casa depois de tantas obras, feliz demais Obrigado pelo apoio de sempre, nos vemos amanha chat 🫶

    8.7K748510234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.6x their median

    Que dia emocionante Feliz demais ver a rapaziada da Loud garantindo a vaga na grande final + vaga para o Champions Fiquei emocionado de verdade, foi bem nostalgico para mim, ver a dedicação e a confiança desse time me lembrou bastante de 2022. Privilegio de ver tudo isso de perto, hoje eu consigo entender melhor o porque das pessoas me pararem e comentarem sobre o que elas estavam fazendo no dia que levantamos a taça do Champions. Torcer é comemorar/sofrer com o time, sempre juntos na vitoria e também na derrota. Amanhã tem a grande final contra 100T, será um jogão, e que a nova geração venha para superar aqueles que mostraram o caminho que deve seguir para chegar lá. Torcendo pelo Brasil sempre. Parabens a todos envolvidos, vamos por mais 🙏

    8.4K195316112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.2x their median

    Triste pelo ano do MIBR, expectativas altas desde o começo e infelizmente as criticas que tiveram desde o começo do ano se pagaram agora. A falta do coletivo foi grande dentro do servidor, rounds com vantagem sendo entregues, quem acompanhou a live ja esperava esse resultado de certa forma, mas como torcedor nos restava a fé. Por outro lado, feliz pelo jogo apresentado pela LOUD. Time resiliente, enfrentou mudanças na equipe, tiveram altos e baixos durante 2026 mas se manteve em pé, a entrada do Tkzin foi a chave pra manter o time vivo. No fim de tudo, estou feliz de termos um time que ainda respira pra representar o Brasil nesses playoffs em Sao Paulo. Visto a camisa do MIBR, torci pelos meninos o ano todo, mas também sou um grande amante desse jogo chamado Valorant. Sempre quis a nossa região no topo, desde o começo esse sempre foi o plano, certo? Fica aqui minha torcida pra LOUD para o resto do campeonato, e a torcida para NRG chegar na final e a Leviatan ir para o Champions. Bora sonhar com os 2 times nos representando no mundial. Ansioso para ver vocês no evento em São Paulo também. Que role uma grande festa, vamos aproveitar o máximo e mostrar o porque a nossa torcida é a melhor de todas. Uma boa semana a todos, nos vemos na sexta 😉

    5.8K92332132K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.1x their median

    Chegamos em Shanghai! 🇨🇳 https://t.co/qTjn1pMmkc

    5.7K4526759K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.9x their median

    negocio é o seguinte tava na ansiedade nesse pos vct, essa semana tava resolvendo varias coisas e finalmente posso falar que deu tudo certo!!! passaporte pronto para VIAJAR prepara que logo logo o anuncio vem e os conteudos tambem 🙏🙏

    5.3K31492154K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.8x their median

    cara, to vendo ninguem puxando a arma nova, Warden, nas rankeds do imortal 3/radiante da China como que ta por ai? alguem jogando com isso?

    5.0K111507213K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20262.4x their median

    série ABSURDA de KRU x LOUD TKZIN é o futuro ! ! ! ! ! GGS

    4.3K6310164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.3x their median

    galera hoje estarei ao lado do spacca pra nao perder a tradicao 10 likes e eu do um tapao na careca dele

    4.3K2428343K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.0x their median

    aloudii

    3.6K11027251K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#valorantchampions

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 365K followers, an engagement rate of 0.511%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 3.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.8K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

What is Sacy's engagement rate on X?
Sacy (@gustavosacy) has an engagement rate of 0.511%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 365,355 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.511%, Sacy sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gustavosacy have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @gustavosacy post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going