Back to @guidogirardi's profile

Guido Girardi engagement report

@guidogirardi - 145K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 145K followers
Per impression
0.765%
784 views on a typical post
Reach
0.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 784 times each, and 0.765% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.542% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 142 interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #ia.

Compared with accounts its own size

Guido Girardi's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Guido Girardi sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link35% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 35% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 738 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202624x their median

    Peter Thiel no es solo un magnate tecnológico. Es un ideólogo que cuestiona abiertamente la democracia y promueve una concentración inédita de poder en datos, algoritmos, energía y política. En este artículo analizo su pensamiento, la influencia política que ha construido en EE.UU., su avance en Argentina y el contrapunto que representa León XIV frente a una visión tecnocrática del futuro. Los invito a leer mi reflexión publicada en @elmostrador 👇 https://t.co/XDCDUPbpEv

    7359736.1K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 202617x their median

    📺 TVN destacó una investigación publicada en The Lancet Regional Health – Americas que entrega la primera evidencia del impacto de la Ley de Etiquetado en la reducción del exceso de peso infantil. Los sellos de advertencia demostraron que una política pública basada en evidencia puede transformar los entornos alimentarios y proteger la salud de niños y niñas.

    6823717.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20269.2x their median

    La empatía es fundamental para la convivencia humana, pero hoy las redes sociales la están poniendo en riesgo. Incentivan el narcisismo, premian la polarización y modifican el funcionamiento de nuestro cerebro para capturar nuestra atención a cualquier costo. Debemos tomar conciencia del impacto que los algoritmos y el anonimato digital tienen en nuestras vidas. No podemos permitir que la tecnología destruya el diálogo cara a cara. #Empatía #Cerebro #Humano #RedesSociales #Tecnología

    3519102.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20268.2x their median

    Construir ciudades inteligentes no se reduce a incorporar más tecnología. Las ciudades inteligentes son aquellas que fortalecen la convivencia y el encuentro humano. Hoy participé en el panel “Camino al Congreso Futuro”, realizado en el marco de #SmartCityExpoSantiago2026 del @Gob_Santiago Junto a Felipe Barnachea, gerente de Fomento de la Corporación Regional de Desarrollo, y Solange Arredondo, gerenta de Sé Santiago, conversamos sobre los desafíos que enfrentan nuestras ciudades y la necesidad de anticiparnos a los cambios tecnológicos, sociales y ambientales que están transformando nuestra forma de vivir.

    3197216K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20267.7x their median

    Es un privilegio para Chile, Congreso Futuro y Proyecta Chile 2050, contar con la participación de Hugo Romero, premio nacional, que ahora recibe un premio mundial. como Fuente: El Mostrador https://t.co/SIbnRMGsIi

    3213101.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20267.2x their median

    Francia acaba de aprobar una ley que prohibirá el acceso a redes sociales a menores de 15 años. Es una decisión que seguramente abrirá posiciones distintas, pero que vuelve a poner sobre la mesa una pregunta urgente: ¿qué tipo de relación estamos construyendo con la tecnología? Cada vez conocemos más evidencia sobre cómo las plataformas digitales utilizan mecanismos que capturan nuestra atención y modifican nuestros hábitos. El problema no es solo el tiempo que pasamos frente a una pantalla, sino cómo eso impacta nuestra capacidad de conversar, de escuchar al otro, de desarrollar empatía y de ejercer un pensamiento crítico. Por eso necesitamos generar más espacios de encuentro. Ese es el sentido de Congreso Jóvenes Futuro: reunir a jóvenes para conversar, intercambiar ideas y construir, juntos, una mirada sobre el futuro. https://t.co/UItW7kehuc

    3112001.9K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20266.3x their median

    ¿Estamos avanzando hacia el fin de lo humano y una posthumanidad impulsada desde Silicon Valley? Conversé sobre el poder de las grandes tecnológicas, la disputa por nuestra atención y la influencia de figuras como Peter Thiel en la construcción del futuro. Los invito a ver la entrevista en #Influyentes de CNN Chile. https://t.co/FMliOEqtUU

    279201.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20265.7x their median

    Hace una década, junto al Dr. Ricardo Uauy, impulsamos la Ley de Etiquetado para enfrentar una de las mayores amenazas para la salud pública: la obesidad. Hoy sus resultados son reconocidos a nivel mundial. Por eso preocupa que Argentina busque derogarla. La evidencia científica debe estar por encima de cualquier interés económico.

    23920964 viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20265.3x their median

    ¿Funcionó la Ley de Etiquetado de Alimentos? A 10 años de su implementación, nueva evidencia publicada en The Lancet muestra efectos concretos en la reducción del exceso de peso infantil. Sobre estos resultados conversé con Guillermo Paraje, economista especializado en salud y líder del estudio, para entender qué nos dice hoy la evidencia sobre una política que abrió camino en Chile y el mundo. Los invito a ver este nuevo capítulo de Conversar lo Posible: https://t.co/O3vlbh5WX7

    237112.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20265.3x their median

    Hace 10 años entró en vigencia la Ley de Etiquetado de Alimentos. Una política pública que demostró que la evidencia científica puede convertirse en decisiones que protegen la salud y mejoran la vida de las personas. Comparto este reportaje de T13 que revisa su impacto y legado. https://t.co/FmgALOlYRW

    226311.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ia

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 784 times each, and 0.765% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.542% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 142 interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is Guido Girardi's engagement rate on X?
Guido Girardi (@guidogirardi) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 144,697 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Guido Girardi sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @guidogirardi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @guidogirardi post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going