一只官 engagement report
@guanguanpuppy - 93K followers on X
Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.282% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 204 interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.05%, 一只官 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Jan 25, 20264.4x their median
刚刚打飞机的时候突然发现自己好像有轻微绿帽癖，这该怎么办🤔
- Aug 8, 20262.6x their median
一个那么瘦弱，那么年轻的女孩。居然在低位自缢的时候，像个玩偶，不挣扎，不喊叫，她的绝望甚至摆脱了生理上的反应，四肢就那么无力的垂下来，像碎布一样。
- Jul 20, 20262.0x their median
你们都觉得女s光鲜亮丽、 你可知昨天我等全季的客服给我送被子等了一晚上也没人来，最后只好盖着m🐍和尿过的被子凑合了一晚上😭
- Jul 25, 20261.8x their median
在杭州奥体这边预约了一个写字楼的美甲，没想到现在进写字楼也要刷身份证刷脸了，我对楼下安保说预约了美甲，二话不说直接让我刷身份证进，输完信息机器自动就给我开人脸识别了，把我的脸部信息录入之后，进门闸需要刷脸，进电梯居然也“被自动”刷脸。看似便捷了，全程不用手动摁键，却让我极端的不适。【一种隐私被明抢】的感觉。 这便捷吗？并没有，我只感觉麻烦，原本只需要写个手机号写个采访时间就能进写字楼的事，没想到现在需要把自己的行程和人脸这么彻彻底底的暴露。我理解一些重要的景点公园，政府大厅、高铁站等录我的脸，或出于安全考量。可一个破私人写字楼为啥也要拿走我的信息，当我进电梯发现电梯也在随时对我的面部进行拍照识别的时候真的一股无名火。 我不禁思考，难道临时进一个写字楼，就需要将人脸识别作为唯一验证方式吗。就不能存在更保护个人隐私的替代方案吗？ 若仅为了临时访问，这座商业写字楼是否有“充分必要性”去收集个人高度敏感的生物识别信息？ 杭州奥体区作为一个城市化新兴板块，也许会成为其他城市发展的样板，如果这种模式推广到全国，所谓的数字化城市是否是以后进入任何公开商业场所，都会自动识别面部，自动登记…我能接受科技公司、系统对我信息默默的“窃取、征用”变成信息大数据洪流的某一滴水，但我确实无法接受如此明目张胆的“拿走”。 毋庸置疑，数字“全景监视”的叙事已经不可逆的在现实中演进着，一个透明又清晰可见的全景监狱。 “我在看着你，但你无能为力。”
- Aug 11, 20261.6x their median
饿一天了，所以对m的惩罚是把他绑起来当着他的面吃完了他点的外卖🥡。😐
- Feb 10, 2026
最近才知道“三通一达”的意思，凭我多年的淫商基本能看住来这个词不是什么描述女性的好词。细查了一下才知道，这又是充斥着厌女和污名化的非常典型的词汇。这种词汇混合了欲望、挫败感、嘲讽和道德优越感等多种情绪，正是中国传统父权贞操观念、现代消费主义对女性的物化、以及全球化背景下性观念流动所引发的男性焦虑，三者混合发酵后的产物。 女留子根本没必要自证，也没有必要搭理牢粉丝。牢a的群众真正不在意牢a讲的三通一达不是，他们只是需要一个理论把平时接触不到的女人打成臭狗屎，得不到就毁灭的心态。牢a只是提供了一个适合他们的理论。这种行为最可怕的不是单纯的排外和“爱国优越感”，而是因为排外而转化成了对内部的攻击。仍属于底层互害的逻辑。 不论是否“三通”，不论女留子还是国女，性观念的是否可以开放、开放到多少程度，本身也应是留在女性内部群体思考和决策的事。 女性拥有支配自己身体和欲望的绝对权利。只要出于自愿、平等、安全，“性开放”（即多伴侣、非婚性行为、探索自身性欲）是女性摆脱传统贞操观念束缚、追求性愉悦和主体性的体现，是真正的解放。从这个角度看，是女性自主意志的选择。 后现代女性主义学者如朱迪斯·巴特勒指出，性别和性行为本身就是被话语和实践建构的。当今“性开放”的叙事，很大程度上与消费主义、个人主义、以及媒体（包括色情作品）所塑造的“性感”标准紧密相关。女性可能在不自觉中，内化了这些标准，认为自己“应该”开放、“应该”拥有丰富的性经验来证明自己的现代和解放。 判断“性开放”的价值，关键在于厘清：它是在扩大还是缩小女性的真实选择空间？是让女性更安全、更自主地探索和享受自己的身体与关系，还是将她们推向新的、更隐蔽的规训与剥削？它是否只是从“某个男性的财产” 变成了“可供消费的性客体们”？即：女性是否从一种单一父权控制陷入了另一种父权逻辑（为满足男性凝视和欲望而表演“开放”）？ 真实扩大女性的选择空间，充分给予女性“性开放”的权力，需要的仍是社会普遍的尊重、理解，需要的是优化社会的性别平等机制，制造出一个包容、多元、去父权的环境。#牢a #三通一达
- Jan 22, 2026
上课、🚪49，⭕️大本营等相关事宜， 私信咨询必回。 接线下课、定制等。
- Jul 27, 2026
遇到下头的圈内s: “怕疼。” “柔韧度差” “我敏感肌，别留痕” “啵啵贝是什么… ” “我还是个处…” 遇到圈外crush： “啵啵贝app我已经提前安装好了，这是失控模式，你一键操作就行” #❌⭕️#
- Apr 8, 2026
日，带一天啵啵贝，尿道已经兵分三路了。
- Mar 29, 2026
女孩子为什么总是喜欢有钱人，因为有钱人会给她们一种能够给她花钱的幻觉。正是由于这种幻觉，让她们的青春消磨在一次又一次被拥有和被抛弃之中，但幻觉又像是迷药一般，毒死了女孩子身后的那一束玫瑰、或是一张电影票。只有多年之后她们才明白一个道理，一些人随手的一个施舍，和另一些人的最原初的赤诚和倾囊付出，根本就不在天平的两端——一枚卡地亚的戒指，和一支会枯萎的玫瑰。她以为她是一个聪明的调停家和算计高手，但冰冷的托盘上，永远存在时间、青春、纯粹、梦和回忆等凝成的看不见的金石。
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.282% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 204 interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is 一只官's engagement rate on X?
- 一只官 (@guanguanpuppy) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 93,270 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.05%, 一只官 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @guanguanpuppy have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @guanguanpuppy post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.