Growth Labs engagement report
@growthhub_ - 505K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 505K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.248% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.022%, Growth Labs sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.695% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 268 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 3, 202424x their median
We’ve been told that money is the only type of wealth. This is a lie. The 4 types of wealth you MUST understand: 1 Financial 2 Social 3 Physical 4 Time Most people prioritize 1 & 2 their whole life only to realize when they're told that 3 & 4 are the most important ones. Let’s walk through each to form a more comprehensive view of wealth: Financial Wealth This is the most commonly understood type of wealth. It's generally what people mean when they say someone is wealthy. Financial wealth is all about money—the money or financial assets that an individual has accumulated. Social Wealth Social wealth is about our connection to others in our respective worlds—our relationships. True social wealth wealth is built through the cultivation of meaningful relationships. Spend time building a T-shaped web of connectivity—broad and deep. Build an army of mentors and friends. Cultivate deep relationships, but also embrace the power of weak ties. Physical Wealth Physical wealth is about your health, fitness, and vitality. It is perhaps the most critical—and under-appreciated—type of wealth. Without physical wealth, it is effectively impossible to experience and enjoy the benefits of any of the other types of wealth. Physical health is built through the long-term compounding of daily actions. There are 3 broad buckets: • Exercise—daily movement • Nutrition—mostly real foods • Sleep—good sleep habits It's never too late to start building—or restoring—physical wealth. Health is wealth. Time Wealth Time wealth is about the freedom to choose: • How to spend your time • Who to spend it with • Where to spend it • When to trade it for other types of wealth Time wealth is also about an appreciation for the precious nature of time—of its value and importance. Too many people fail to realize the value of this precious asset until it is gone. Treat time as your ultimate currency—it’s all you have and you can never get it back. NEVER let the pursuit of financial wealth rob you of your time and physical wealth. Want to take the first step to building your own business and creating wealth? Here's your playbook: https://t.co/BN6JaUdGCu
- Jan 18, 20266.0x their median
https://t.co/uD01swnL8I
- Aug 27, 20266.1x their median
Mesh cleanup, UV unwrapping, and texture baking are live on Customuse. AI gives you amazing meshes with messy topology and broken UVs. Not good enough for production. Now: generate → clean → unwrap → bake. All in one place. Live now. https://t.co/vZkaNBQe6Z
- Sep 18, 20264.6x their median
Europe is the best place in the world to live and the worst place to be a founder. Took a short break in Europe this Summer. First real one in 6 months. Every meal here is a masterpiece: fresh, simple, real. A random café in Paris eats 99% of US restaurants alive. Then you land back in the US and you start feeling the energy. The speed. The ambition. The stakes. The paranoia that someone, somewhere, is shipping faster than you. America is the best country in the world to be a founder and the worst in the world to eat a healthy meal. Pick your poison. I filmed my whole experience. aisloP episode 8: "The Break”, out now.
- Oct 5, 2026
Everyone is certain AI is about to replace human creativity. Rick Rubin doesn't see it that way after 40 years working with artists like Jay-Z and Adele. Here's how he thinks it will change creativity instead: 1) AI makes taste more valuable https://t.co/vFdV5XtD59
- Aug 10, 2026
Ray Kurzweil said something recently that stopped me mid-thought. His take is that AIs are heading toward a point where they’ll be so convincingly “alive” that we’ll start treating them as conscious by default. Not because anyone finally cracks the hard problem, but because refusing to will feel increasingly pointless. He noted we’re already partway there. People are using AI therapists, and some users are beginning to relate to them as if there’s someone real on the other side. As the systems get sharper, that instinct to grant them inner lives will spread. In Kurzweil’s view, the transition won’t be gradual for long. Once AIs reliably display every outward signature we associate with consciousness, most of society won’t bother drawing a line. It’s a subtle prediction with huge consequences. Our working meaning of “person”, or at least “mind”, could quietly update itself far faster than we expect. So what’s your guess: how soon before we act like AIs are conscious? Interested in AI? Follow @AiEvolutio58513 and never fall behind. I track ChatGPT, Claude, and every tool quietly changing how we work and create, then hand you the tested signals.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 505K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.248% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.6K interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Growth Labs's engagement rate on X?
- Growth Labs (@growthhub_) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 504,839 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.022%, Growth Labs sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @growthhub_ have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @growthhub_ post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.