Back to @gregolsen88's profile

Greg Olsen engagement report

@gregolsen88 - 477K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.007%
of 477K followers
Per impression
0.383%
8.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Posts are seen about 8.4K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.3K interactions, about 166x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Greg Olsen sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 142 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 2026166x their median

    Dan Campbell has a special spot in his heart for high school football. I asked the Lions head coach if he had a message for players and coaches beginning their seasons. His answer was as fantastic as you’d expect it to be. https://t.co/Z29uer4GuJ

    4.4K68161136860K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202620x their median

    Some of the best baseball players I ever coached spent their falls in shoulder pads or on a pitch. They arrived in the spring as competitors, not just players. The scoreboard pressure, the different locker room, the coach with a different voice. You cannot buy that at a showcase.

    505872012246K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202612x their median

    Anthony Colandrea finds Jamal Rule for SIX πŸ”₯ @HuskerFootball https://t.co/HILHk8CjyZ

    3493625588K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.3x their median

    High school football is for the 'normal kid,' not just the Power 4 recruit | Ingle Martin https://t.co/a6xFlReGPX

    100253967K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    Our Week 5 Players of the Week Blake McCullough @blake_mcc7 @HornetFB_1MOORE CJ Nassar @CJNassar13 @BooneBravesFB https://t.co/PZq68h30fi

    1711138.4K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 2026

    Former USMNT star Landon Donovan tells FOS that his biggest influences in sports broadcasting are baseball analyst John Smoltz and football analyst Greg Olsen. "Those are kind of two guys I would say I try to model myself after when I'm calling games." https://t.co/6rL8U1CgEF

    2641129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    🚨 Who needs to be on your radar in the class of 2030 🚨 We have the answers! πŸ—£οΈ Check out the latest update of our 2030 Rankings! πŸ‘€πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/QPzdSYURa3 @_cruzcochran @5_reasonss @Jaceconnelly6 @AmorieD189402 @Jay5DelRosario @5_StarJordan @SayMone69630805 @itsdeuceee1 https://t.co/yYwAIfdZVW

    940413K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 477K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Posts are seen about 8.4K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.3K interactions, about 166x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Greg Olsen's engagement rate on X?
Greg Olsen (@gregolsen88) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 477,309 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Greg Olsen sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gregolsen88 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @gregolsen88 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going