Back to @gregkellyusa's profile

Greg Kelly engagement report

@gregkellyusa - 991K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.422%
of 991K followers
Per impression
10.4%
40K views on a typical post
Reach
4.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.125%
50 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.43/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 4.2K interactions against 991K followers, an engagement rate of 0.422%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 10.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026. Recurring tag: #september11.

Compared with accounts its own size

Greg Kelly's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.422%, Greg Kelly sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 220 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 7, 20265.2x their median

    The TRUTH. And the Fake News Can’t Handle it. So PROUD To be with TRUMP. NOW MORE THAN EVER. https://t.co/YzYZifJsEt

    17K2.6K1.6K119261K viewsView on X
  • May 1, 20263.3x their median

    I am SICK of the SPIN. Before this video release, the Secret Service DIRECTOR said the officer who was shot opened fire and “while being shot was in the process of falling down”—That’s NOT what happens here. There’s no “falling down”-they’re talking to us like we’re CHILDREN https://t.co/mt6XWQUec6

    11K2.2K770761.7M viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 20262.7x their median

    “Security”—The Most Controversial Political Figure in HISTORY is in the room they are assigned to Guard, and NONE OF THEM spot the threat. The GUNMAN (Red Arrow) is Already in a sprint. All FIVE (Blue Arrows) security members in this photo are looking in the WRONG Direction. Two are already Dismantling the Magnetometer for an event that has Barely started.

    7.3K3.2K748161193K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262.2x their median

    “You don’t have to look at the facts and the law.”- Letitia James https://t.co/jm8mYT7nrT

    7.1K1.4K304246630K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.1x their median

    AGAIN! The @FBI SPIED on President TRUMP’s Campaign!  The SPIED on President Trump-AGAIN!!! And don’t give me the “this is old news” CRAP.  Nobody understands the SCOPE and AUDACITY of what the Deep State and BIDEN pulled on TRUMP.  People MUST go to PRiSON.  How Dare They.  And they say Trump is a “threat to democracy” —These BASTARDS waged a COUP. Where the Hell is Chris “Pretty Boy” Wray (ex FBI director) HIDING !?!????

    6.1K2.3K3317150K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.6x their median

    This “Mid-Term” Convention was a gamble. AND A BRILLIANT ONE. The Momentum, Force, the Stars, the TRUTH!!! Awesome IDEA!  VICTORY! https://t.co/rPE16M4Kla

    5.5K94370934K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 2026

    WOW!  The “Police Commissioner” REALLY STINKS at her JOB.   https://t.co/Bv8ZH9GM5N

    4.0K96745472172K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 2026

    Iran Deal He Did It.   Again! https://t.co/TNWwzw27xF

    4.1K4346031336K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    President Trump with a Generous SHOUT OUT to ME and my fellow TV LEGENDS. Thank you POTUS! The FAKE NEWS Lies, Distorts, Conceals….We Speak TRUTH. The People can Beat The Freaks and WIN the Midterms. GET PUMPED! https://t.co/8oa8Fe6gRQ

    3.9K704135935K viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 20269.7x their median

    🚨🚨@RCPolitics SECRET SERVICE EXCLUSIVE: In the wake of another assassination attempt on President Trump at the White House Correspondents' Dinner Saturday night, sources tell me that White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles rejected efforts by former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem to impose more reforms on the Secret Service earlier this year after a string of scandals and failures. The DHS leadership team at the time wanted to install a political, hand-selected chief counsel after Secret Service Director Sean Curran's top attorney resigned after an embarrassing road-rage incident, which RealClearPolitics first reported. Wiles, who directly oversaw the Secret Service and kept Curran in place despite numerous lapses and scandals, resisted efforts to install a hand-selected chief counsel, a former administration official with direct information about it told @RCPolitics. These sources also contend that Wiles undercut another effort to have a DHS deputy chief of staff offer reform recommendations to the Secret Service. In fact, when the DHS deputy chief of staff visited the Secret Service to offer them, Wiles had the individual walked out of the building after Curran complained to her, the sources assert. The security lapses and embarrassing incidents include: missing the stand in a tree at West Palm Beach International airport, allowing Code Pink protesters to harass Trump and several cabinet members at a D.C. restaurant, missing a glock during screening at a Trump golf course in Virginia, two officers getting into a physical fight outside President Obama's residence, an agent celebrating Charlie KIrk's assassination on social media, and numerous others. How many close calls does Trump get before Curran and others at the Secret Service lose their jobs? — a former administration official asked in an interview with @RCPolitics after the assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents Dinner. “The guy is going to get killed, and everyone will keep their jobs,” the former official remarked. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt flatly denied the assertions that Wiles opposed the DHS leadership team's Secret Service reforms. "Let me be clear: Nobody cares more or has pushed harder, or has asked more hard questions about President Trump's safety than Susie Wiles," she said in a statement to RCP. "The insinuation that Susie would object to anything that would help strengthen protection for her boss and friend is absolutely absurd." Leavitt did not respond to specific questions about whether Wiles was involved in a decision to walk the DHS deputy chief of staff offering reform recommendations out of Secret Service headquarters or rejected the appointment of a political chief counsel. A source familiar with presidential security protocols said Wiles has let Curran remain in his job despite numerous failures on his watch and no firings for Butler. In fact, Curran gave two Butler supervisors big promotions even though they failed to ensure that all the buildings at the Butler rally were covered with security assets One is now an assistant director in charge of professional responsibility and all disciplinary actions against Secret Service employees. “They’re about to fire Kash, and he had nothing to do with this when Susie oversees the Secret Service, and it’s failure after failure after failure, and she gets no blame,” the source said. “This should’ve been the most secure perimeter in the world. And the fact that the guy made it through the mags underscores the epic failure of the US Secret Service in protecting the president.” Other sources tell RCP that Wiles never wanted Curran as USSS director, but Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump pulled for him. If anything goes wrong, "It's on the boys," for choosing him, Wiles has remarked to other top administration officials after Trump decided to tap him, according to multiple administration sources.

    2.4K1.1K457159546K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#september11

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.2K interactions against 991K followers, an engagement rate of 0.422%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 10.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

What is Greg Kelly's engagement rate on X?
Greg Kelly (@gregkellyusa) has an engagement rate of 0.422%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 991,396 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.422%, Greg Kelly sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gregkellyusa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @gregkellyusa post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going