Back to @graciebon1's profile

gracie bon engagement report

@graciebon1 - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.778%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
2.83%
329K views on a typical post
Reach
27.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
9.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.614%
2.0K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 9.3K interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.778%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 329K times each, and 2.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

gracie bon's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.778%, gracie bon sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Mar 22, 202413x their median

    i guess i’ll just take my things and go https://t.co/pJTpswpi4V

    105K16K2271.1K5.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202312x their median

    https://t.co/Qn5E4ODNCg

    69K6.4K3.7K4.5K32M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.0x their median

    my body scan, can’t wait for GTA 6 on November 19th. thank you @rockstargames for making one of my biggest dreams come true. this is for all the gorditas in the world, we are finally being included in the BIGGEST game ever 🙏🏼 https://t.co/hCGgGdrBEG

    69K2.8K2.1K1.0K8.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20237.9x their median

    me and who https://t.co/77t67yCeqR

    46K8.7K1791.2K3.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20263.7x their median

    how thick is too thick? https://t.co/N84C6PznXz

    33K1.1K794892.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.7x their median

    would you come to a date with me wearing this dress? https://t.co/wtyePC3UYj

    32K1.1K74029929K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.0x their median

    i can explain but i think it would be funnier if i didn’t https://t.co/vpDXnkFssx

    18K57327512336K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 20261.6x their median

    rate my pajamas from 1-10 https://t.co/Gp4FSQuLwu

    13K69238314905K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    rate my dance baby https://t.co/24dXHpnq9W

    13K42319111472K viewsView on X
  • Jan 2, 20251.9x their median

    we need bigger elevators pls https://t.co/VLsoC3WlbU

    12K73710381.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 9.3K interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.778%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 329K times each, and 2.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is gracie bon's engagement rate on X?
gracie bon (@graciebon1) has an engagement rate of 0.778%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,198,495 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.778%, gracie bon sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @graciebon1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @graciebon1 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going