Back to @goldman's profile

Jason Goldman engagement report

@goldman - 869K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 869K followers
Per impression
0.393%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
1.96%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
67
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.23/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 67 interactions against 869K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.393% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 610x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jason Goldman's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Jason Goldman sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link24% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 2026610x their median

    "ESPN personality Pat McAfee released an album of original music on Friday. Critics say if the album is played backwards, the listener could hear hidden demonic messages. More worrying still, if the album is played forward, the listener could hear original music by Pat McAfee." https://t.co/TTAUzFf8BD

    37K3.6K1591001.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026412x their median

    THE GREATEST LL MOUND VISIT OF ALL TIME!! “If you walk the next 5 batters Jesus is still lord,if you strikeout the next 5 batters Jesus is still lord” 🙏🏻 ✝️🙏🏻✝️ #llws #espn #patmcafee https://t.co/T3ZiQhQI73

    24K2.1K88599013M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026366x their median

    Drug companies Moderna and Merck have just announced a vaccine that could stop cancer from spreading, funded with an mRNA NIH research grant. HHS Secretary RFK Jr. chose to end 22 similar mRNA research projects worth $500M in 2025. https://t.co/ECupDFcpgC

    19K5.2K364201440K viewsView on X
  • Jan 29, 202615x their median

    There are people who hate clutter and there are people who love to make little piles everywhere that they will get to later and these people marry each other.

    21K852185192838K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026287x their median

    They’re calling it the best final jeopardy question of all time https://t.co/f6ry9bljCl

    18K6715301254.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026172x their median

    Scandinavian folk song played on a NyckelHarpa, origins of the string instrument dates back to the 15th century. Folk Artist: Myrkur https://t.co/XKAcXMddSD

    9.5K1.7K147182600K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026141x their median

    a sister *bang bang* a witch *bang bang* and what was her sister? *bang bang* a princess *bang bang* the wicked witch of the east, bro *bang bang* https://t.co/6Pb0TTQsz1

    8.8K656611198K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026123x their median

    i’m actually on woke 3. i have a few invite codes left, dm me if you want one. you’re not gonna believe the new takes this baby comes with

    7.7K553307114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202686x their median

    “The US is worse than Al Qaeda bc we caused more deaths” is a bad take, but at least it establishes a defensible, sort of utilitarian, standard: The people that cause the most deaths are the worst people. But you can’t hold that standard and also be pro-Mao, on net. That doesn’t make any sense.

    5.0K38631387310K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202685x their median

    this dsa co chair lays out the dsa ideal for palestine. when the interviewer mentions that the dsa ideal resembles what bill clinton was trying to broker at the 2000 camp david summit, she goes blank bc she does not know what that is. holy fuck. https://t.co/12dftmIKZc

    4.7K610221126442K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 67 interactions against 869K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.393% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 610x its own typical post.

What is Jason Goldman's engagement rate on X?
Jason Goldman (@goldman) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 869,378 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Jason Goldman sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @goldman have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @goldman post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going