Back to @goal's profile

GOAL engagement report

@goal - 10M followers on X

Measured over 376 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 10M followers
Per impression
1.13%
92K views on a typical post
Reach
0.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
13.07/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 10M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 376 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.891% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 13.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 376 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

Measured over 376 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

GOAL's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, GOAL sits above the 10th percentile of the 155,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.603%
p902.31%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 155,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,076 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.603%
90th percentile2.31%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link73% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 73% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 202634x their median

    Bayern Munich had scored in 59 consecutive competitive matches—until they ran into this guy ... šŸ”„āŒļø https://t.co/EpMHLpqW5b

    34K1.4K164148891K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202627x their median

    Zion Suzuki is the first Japanese goalkeeper to play in the Premier League šŸ‡ÆšŸ‡µ History šŸ‘ https://t.co/GBsXeQwZiH

    27K99711534312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202625x their median

    Anthony Gordon is enjoying life in Spain šŸ‡ŖšŸ‡ø ā˜€ļø āš½ļø 3 games šŸ…°ļø 3 assists The England winger has made a great start in a Barcelona shirt šŸ”„ https://t.co/RzzLG5TzlA

    26K9112610307K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202625x their median

    Xabi Alonso will return to Anfield as the manager of Chelsea in the Carabao Cup fourth round 😬 šŸ‘€ https://t.co/cATscPKV50

    25K761344330K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202622x their median

    Will Alvaro Arbeloa become the first manager sacked in the Premier League? šŸ¤” āŒļø Chelsea 2-3 āŒļø Sunderland 1-0 āŒļø Crystal Palace 2-3 https://t.co/qx6tctGbnA

    22K968246196612K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202622x their median

    Gabriel Martinelli makes his Saudi Pro League debut as Al-Hilal cruise to a 2-0 victory over Al-Shabab 🚨 https://t.co/vlAoLb0sdO

    22K789419320K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202622x their median

    It's really been nine years since Neymar made his PSG debut 😳 Time flies 🄲 https://t.co/tnqXzzrBnJ

    22K6555423350K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202621x their median

    Rodri in a Barcelona shirt feels right 🤩 https://t.co/Kstppxezuh

    21K6565117334K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202621x their median

    Egyptian starlet Hamza Abdelkarim has been added to Barcelona's first-team squad for the 2026-27 La Liga campaign āœ… Read more šŸ”— https://t.co/GpsaIuqH7D https://t.co/weLZbFlazw

    20K8184441288K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202620x their median

    Thank you, Leo! šŸ‘‹ Lionel Messi has worn the blue and white jersey for the last time šŸ‡¦šŸ‡·šŸ˜” https://t.co/y7a9MCy3FF

    19K1.4K6010188K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 10M followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 376 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.891% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 13.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 376 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 34x its own typical post.

What is GOAL's engagement rate on X?
GOAL (@goal) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 376 original posts from the last 30 days against 10,352,073 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, GOAL sits above the 10th percentile of the 155,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @goal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @goal post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 13.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going