Back to @giveashitnature's profile

Give A Shit About Nature engagement report

@giveashitnature - 186K followers on X

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.685%
of 186K followers
Per impression
7.19%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
9.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.35%
62 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.685%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,688 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 7.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Give A Shit About Nature's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,688 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.685%, Give A Shit About Nature sits above the 75th percentile of the 208,677 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.685% to 2.58%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.144%
p750.685%
p902.58%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 208,677 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,322 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.144%
75th percentile0.685%
90th percentile2.58%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1085 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 20269.3x their median

    Dandelions are one of the last flowers standing in the fall. Spray one with roundup and you're spraying every bumblebee queen that visits, just as she's preparing to hibernate. The flower doesn't die on contact. It takes days, and it keeps getting visited the entire time. Bumblebee queens are feeding hard right now, building the fat reserves that have to carry them through months underground with no colony and no food. Every queen that doesn't fatten up is a colony that doesn't start next spring. Research from Finland found glyphosate-exposed bumblebees lost the ability to tell flowers apart by color, and lost their sensitivity to the ultraviolet patterns bees use to find nectar. Late solitary bees, hoverflies, and butterflies are working the same flowers too. If the dandelions genuinely bother you, dig them out. A weeding fork gets the taproot. Or leave them. The first hard frost takes care of it.

    10K1.8K43391.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20265.5x their median

    In April 2009, dozens of cedar waxwings were found dead in a single yard in Thomas County, Georgia. Their stomachs were packed with one thing: small, red berries. The birds had hemorrhaged into their lungs, tracheas, hearts and brains. It was cyanide poisoning. A decade later the curator of the UNC Chapel Hill Herbarium found dead waxwings on campus, in sight of a large nandina planting. That's what finally prompted somebody to test the berries. Nandina, sold as heavenly bamboo, is from China and Japan, it's invasive across the Southeast, and it's still sold at garden centers. Most birds can detoxify small amounts of cyanide. Eat one or two nandina berries and you'll be sick for a day. Cedar waxwings don't eat one or two. They gorge on them. A flock strips a bush in minutes. And the ripe berries release cyanide slowly as they digest. There's no warning, no bad taste, nothing that says stop. By the time it's hitting, the bird has a crop full of them. Worse, nandina berries hang on all winter, when almost nothing else is fruiting. It's most attractive exactly when the birds have the fewest options. If you have one, cut the berry clusters off before they ripen. That solves the problem this year. Then dig it out. Get under the root crown and pry it up, or it comes back. Alternatively, a cut stump with a dab of herbicide will usually kill it for good. Replace it with winterberry holly, American holly, or eastern red cedar. Red berries all winter, and waxwings are supposed to eat those.

    5.3K1.6K5270342K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20265.3x their median

    The yellowjackets are winding down for the year. Their nests are a few weeks from collapse. And they're hangry. All summer long, the workers were hunting protein: caterpillars, flies, grubs - all of the stuff eating your garden. They fed it to the larvae, and the larvae fed them back a sugary secretion. That was the deal. But in late summer, the queen stops laying. The larvae pupate. No new larvae replace them. With no more larvae, there's no more sugar. That leaves a few thousand workers with nothing to do and nothing to eat. So they go looking. Your soda, your trash can, the peach on the ground, all good options. The same insect that ignored you in June is now in your face in September because its food supply ended and you've got the good stuff. Pretty much none of them will survive the first real frost. The workers, the queen, the whole colony dies. Only the new queens make it, scattered and alone under bark, and they'll never come back to that nest. The big gray one in the tree is either already empty or about to be, and it won't be reused. Cover your drinks, keep the trash lid on, and give them a few weeks. They've been working for you all summer, let them die in dignity.

    6.0K51117641317K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.9x their median

    It's time for my occasional reminder that balloons don't fly up to grandma up in heaven. They go up about five miles, burst, and fall back down. What lands is a translucent scrap of latex with a ribbon attached, floating on water, stuck on land, looking almost exactly like a jellyfish. Sea turtles, seabirds and fish eat them. Balloons are the deadliest piece of plastic a seabird can ingest, something like 32 times more likely to kill than a hard fragment, because soft latex folds and blocks the gut instead of passing through. The ribbon stays intact for years, and it wraps around necks, wings and flippers long after the balloon itself is gone. The biodegradable balloons don't fix the problem. University of Tasmania researchers buried latex balloons in industrial compost, the fastest breakdown environment that exists, and dug them up 16 weeks later fully intact. Louisiana made intentional releases a finable offense this year. Most of Europe has banned them. If you want to mark something: plant a tree, light a candle, blow bubbles, ring a bell. Whatever you're releasing it for, it isn't going where you want it to go.

    4.3K1.9K515152K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.6x their median

    PSA: Your washing machine won't reliably kill ticks, but your dryer will. A USDA entomologist figured this out after he found a live one crawling on his washer's agitator. So he bagged up tick nymphs and ran them through the laundry. Most survived the cold and warm cycles. 95% of the lone star ticks survived hot water. What killed them is the dryer. A CDC team later found that dry clothes tossed straight into the dryer on high heat killed the ticks in about 6 minutes. Washing first made it worse: the damp load took 50 minutes on high to do the same job. Ticks die by drying out, and wet clothes buy them time. In a lot of the country, adult deer ticks get a second season in October and November, right when everyone's out raking leaves. They don't quit at the first frost. They're out on any day warm enough, even in winter. When you come in from the yard or from a long hike this fall, put your clothes in the dryer on high for 10 minutes, then wash them. The ticks won't stand a chance.

    4.7K1.0K5273162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.6x their median

    If you're a little ocean critter, it really sucks ass when a human rolls up and picks you up out of the water. Take the humble sea star, for example. No gills, no lungs. It breathes through tiny bumps on its skin that pull oxygen straight out of the water. Lift it into the air for a photo and those bumps collapse. The critter suffocates. And the grab itself does damage too. Sea stars, limpets, and mussels hang onto the rock with everything they've got, because letting go means getting eaten or washed away. Pry one off and you can tear it or kill it. Flip a rock and whatever lives underneath gets baked by the sun. In a lot of marine protected areas, picking up an animal even for a second can get you fined. Crouch down, get close, take the picture in the water. If you have to touch, wet your hand in seawater, make sure it's sunscreen-free, and use two fingers. Then leave it where it is.

    3.8K801131554K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20263.5x their median

    Every use of a leaf blower is a massacre. A typical blower pushes air out at 150 to 200 mph. That's faster than a Category 5 hurricane, aimed straight at the layer of leaves where next year's butterflies, moths, and fireflies are hoping to spend the winter. Woolly bear caterpillars curl up under those leaves. Luna moths hide their cocoons in them, disguised as dead leaves. Fireflies lay their eggs in them. Bumblebee queens sleep an inch or two below. Blast the beds down to bare dirt and all of it gets scattered, exposed or bagged for the landfill. Flip it to vacuum mode and it's even worse. It sucks up whatever's in the leaves, insects and spiders included, and chops it up. In 2019, Germany's environment ministry told people not to use leaf blowers unless they're indispensable, because small animals get sucked in or blown around and damaged. Get a rake. Move the leaves off the lawn and driveway, pile them whole in your garden beds and under your trees, and leave them there until spring. Next year's bumblebees and fireflies will thank you.

    3.3K1.1K875074K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.5x their median

    In 1987, Costa Rica was 21% forest. Today it's about 57%. They saved and restored their forests by paying people not to cut their trees with money from a tax on gasoline. The country was 75% forested land in 1940, but then experienced one of the Earth's worst deforestation rates, mostly for cattle pasture. In 1996, they passed a forestry law that did two things. It made clearing forest without approval illegal, and it created Pago por Servicios Ambientales: direct payments to private landowners for the ecosystem services their standing forest provides. More than 18,000 families and cooperatives have signed contracts. Close to a million hectares have been enrolled at one point or another. But those taxes and giveaways destroyed the economy and killed all the jobs, right? Nope. 1987, the year forest cover bottomed out, is also the year the tourism boom started. Costa Rica went from 329,000 visitors in 1988 to over three million by 2018. By 1995, tourism was the country's largest source of foreign currency. Since 1999 it has earned more foreign exchange than bananas, pineapples and coffee exports combined. GDP per capita, adjusted for purchasing power, went from about $11,000 in 1991 to roughly $27,000 today. Growth has averaged over 4% a year since 1992. In 2025 the World Bank reclassified Costa Rica as a high-income country, the only one in Central America. It wasn't the economy or the forests. It's an economy because of the forests.

    3.5K907415293K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.5x their median

    "Free-range" on an egg carton means the barn has a door. That's it. Just access to the outdoors. No minimum square footage, no minimum time, no requirement that anything even be growing out there, and nobody checking whether a single hen ever walks through it. Cage-free is an even weaker marketing term. It only means the hens aren't in battery cages. They still live indoors with no outdoor access required. And pasture-raised isn't totally in the clear either. It's a label with no federal definition for eggs. The FDA never wrote a standard for the term. Anyone can print it on an egg carton. The labels that actually mean something are all third-party given. Look for these: Certified Humane Pasture Raised. 108 square feet of pasture per hen, outside at least six hours a day. Animal Welfare Approved. Continuous outdoor access on living vegetation. The strictest one going. Global Animal Partnership, Step 4 or higher. Otherwise, take every marketing label with a mighty grain of salt.

    3.7K664301675K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.0x their median

    Why spend $3,000 on a fence when you can build a dead hedge for free? Two rows of stakes driven into the ground, and everything you prune goes in between them. Branches, limbs, brush, the stuff you'd otherwise be dragging to the curb. It gets denser every year. The bottom composts down, you keep feeding the top, and after a couple of seasons it's a more solid barrier than a wooden fence. It's not just a fence, it's also habitat. Wrens and catbirds nest in the structure. Cottontails, chipmunks, toads and skinks shelter at the base. Solitary bees and ground beetles overwinter in the gaps. Germany has been building these as wildlife corridors since the 1990s. The UK uses them on riverbank restoration.

    3.3K466662291K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.685%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,688 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 7.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.

What is Give A Shit About Nature's engagement rate on X?
Give A Shit About Nature (@giveashitnature) has an engagement rate of 0.685%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 185,879 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.685%, Give A Shit About Nature sits above the 75th percentile of the 208,677 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @giveashitnature have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,688 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @giveashitnature post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going