Back to @giuliainnocenzi's profile

Giulia Innocenzi engagement report

@giuliainnocenzi - 238K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.632%
of 238K followers
Per impression
4.07%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
15.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.632%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 4.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.5K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #report, #emmabonino, #inonda.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #report, #emmabonino, #inonda.

Compared with accounts its own size

Giulia Innocenzi's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.632%, Giulia Innocenzi sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,076 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,928 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link57% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 57% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 244 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20265.0x their median

    INVIATI DI REPORT: PROPOSTA IRRICEVIBILE, PRONTI AD ANDARCENE La decisione assunta dalla Rai è per noi completamente irricevibile. Nel caso in cui la Rai non intenda tornare sui propri passi, abbandoneremo in blocco il programma #report #reportrai3 https://t.co/6C4CCfEV1S

    4.0K1.1K2.2K207277K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20263.8x their median

    #GIULEMANIDAREPORT A fronte della sospensione delle repliche estive di #Report, che sarebbero dovute andare in onda da stasera, vi chiediamo una mano, perché noi vogliamo esserci comunque! La storia delle nostre inchieste non può essere cancellata per decreto aziendale https://t.co/ikZWBto8sI

    3.4K1.3K91112899K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.4x their median

    Siamo disposti a rinunciare al nostro lavoro e alla nostra sicurezza economica pur di salvare Report 👊🏿 https://t.co/LcfvrAsjk4 #Report #reportrai

    2.8K5951.6K109143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.2x their median

    «Pronti alle dimissioni in blocco» Sono stata intervistata da @InOndaLa7 su @La7tv riguardo al caos che sta travolgendo la trasmissione dopo le ultime decisioni della Rai. https://t.co/kWA6fq9UXg

    1.9K4442.4K143202K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20263.0x their median

    La redazione di @reportrai3 ha scritto un comunicato contro la sospensione delle repliche estive decisa dalla Rai #report https://t.co/4AWye9SCkP

    2.9K1.2K4077654K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.0x their median

    HANNO UCCISO REPORT @fattoquotidiano #report #reportrai https://t.co/caXzwdwVTY

    2.1K5821.8K11890K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.7x their median

    No a un commissariamento di #Report! Noi inviati ci opponiamo a qualunque scelta che possa minare l’indipendenza e la libertà della principale trasmissione d’inchiesta in Italia https://t.co/DRJFD5whMc

    2.4K6979435852K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 20261.6x their median

    +++ULTIM’ORA: INDAGATA LA PARLAMENTARE MICHELA VITTORIA BRAMBILLA+++ Due anni fa a @reportrai3 ci eravamo occupati delle centinaia di migliaia di euro passati da Enci alle casse della trasmissione tv della parlamentare. Oggi sono partiti sequestri e perquisizioni #Brambilla https://t.co/pVch8Pa89u

    2.6K7691523847K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.1x their median

    Oggi voglio espormi su una cosa molto molto grave che è successa. Non starò in silenzio. E vi spiego perché in questo video. https://t.co/UJhM8qLzfZ

    2.0K49664839104K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.0x their median

    Il 30 settembre portiamo in Italia il film vietato in Israele, The Bibi Files Il documentario che inchioda Netanyahu per le accuse di corruzione. Per avere una riduzione sui biglietti e ricevere tutte le info sulle proiezioni: https://t.co/R4HatEYNgP https://t.co/NpOB9Bgo9X

    1.8K6984075145K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#report#emmabonino#inonda#reportrai

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.632%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 4.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.5K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #report, #emmabonino, #inonda.

What is Giulia Innocenzi's engagement rate on X?
Giulia Innocenzi (@giuliainnocenzi) has an engagement rate of 0.632%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 237,753 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.632%, Giulia Innocenzi sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @giuliainnocenzi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @giuliainnocenzi post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going