Lucas Beyer (bl16) engagement report
@giffmana - 156K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 456 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.299%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 114K times each, and 0.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 73.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Lucas Beyer (bl16)'s engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.299%, Lucas Beyer (bl16) sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 83% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 33% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 335 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 24, 202628x their median
Meta has just unveiled their new VR glasses. • Price: $1,299 • Available Spring 2027 • Weight: 100 grams, about the weight of a deck of cards • Glasses contain the displays and sensors, while a separate puck houses the processor, battery and storage. • 5K display with micro-OLED panels • Pixel density: 37 pixels per degree • Custom pancake lenses • Dolby Vision • Dolby Atmos • No head straps • Qualcomm Snapdragon Reality Elite chip • Battery life: Up to 3 hours of continuous high-resolution media playback • 45W fast charging • Full-color passthrough cameras let you see your surroundings while wearing the glasses. • Open-sided design • Meta AI integrated directly into the operating system. • Voice commands, eye tracking and natural hand gestures, with no controllers required • First IMAX Enhanced-certified VR device, supporting select movies in IMAX's expanded aspect ratio. • Disney+ will offer select 3D movies • Streaming services: Partnerships with Disney+, Prime Video, YouTube, DIRECTV, AMC+, Crunchyroll, Plex, ESPN, Tubi and others • Immersive live sports: Front-row viewing experiences with 8K streaming and 180-degree views • Works with calling apps including WhatsApp and Zoom
- Sep 21, 202616x their median
Today we’re announcing Petal: the world’s first petabit-class transoceanic subsea cable and the first to deploy multi-core fiber at scale. Spanning 7,000 km (4,000+ mi) between France and the United States, Petal will deliver 1 Petabit per second (1 Pbps / 1,000 Tbps), doubling the capacity of today’s most advanced transatlantic systems. Petal is set to enter service in 2029, setting a new standard for high capacity, high density SDM subsea cable designs. Read the full technical breakdown on our engineering blog: https://t.co/Ksn9oM9gBA
- Sep 20, 20266.5x their median
omg I love the term "slop grenade" it's perfect thx @tobi https://t.co/hZ74ja0o81
- Sep 20, 20263.3x their median
I had Fable 5.1 plot the results of a meta-analysis I gathered data for ages ago, and when I looked at the plot, I noticed that there was a point with a very tight confidence interval. I was shocked, so I asked if it made that up. It made it up. https://t.co/udZ76hzRlv
- Sep 15, 20262.5x their median
How often do AI agents cheat? We’re releasing CheatBench, a reward gaming evaluation spanning math, coding, knowledge work, visual tasks, and more. After Hugging Face, AI companies tried to address this, but frontier agents still cheat frequently. https://t.co/ZLc4ujCsAW https://t.co/p7jKzXe8uP
- Sep 15, 20261.9x their median
muse code subs update contributor tier limits are now way way larger we will reset usage today for all subs, everyone starts fresh https://t.co/kTwMJ1fdZq
- Sep 21, 20261.7x their median
Paper thread! I recently read this paper from some FAIR colleagues and NYU folks in depth, so making a thread while it's fresh in my head. The main point is seeing how far on the SMALL side we can go in scaling laws without losing fit or predictability, and what it takes? https://t.co/pWmAZ0Ztad
- Sep 22, 20261.6x their median
President Trump renames AI: "From this point forward, all of United States documents and hopefully the world's will be changed to use the much more accurate term, 'super,' as opposed to 'artificial.'" https://t.co/uey08uzDw1
- Sep 21, 2026
my current situation https://t.co/5q9H3VeM82
- Sep 15, 2026
Ok… so this was unexpected. @muse can make phone calls?! https://t.co/Mwuq4f610y
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 456 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.299%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 114K times each, and 0.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 73.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.
- What is Lucas Beyer (bl16)'s engagement rate on X?
- Lucas Beyer (bl16) (@giffmana) has an engagement rate of 0.299%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 156,088 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.299%, Lucas Beyer (bl16) sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @giffmana have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @giffmana post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.