Back to @ggluvcats's profile

` กิกิ · engagement report

@ggluvcats - 300K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
2.00%
of 300K followers
Per impression
3.66%
164K views on a typical post
Reach
54.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
92 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 6.0K interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 2.00%. Posts are seen about 164K times each, and 3.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 54.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 148K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.00%, ` กิกิ · sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 108 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 21, 202625x their median

    Una gata embarazada estaba por parir Así que su amiga paloma fue y se puso a hacerle un nido https://t.co/Ap7nWB8p1K

    132K14K5101.6K13M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 201923x their median

    ถึงเธอจะทำเราเจ็บ แต่ถ้าเรารักเธอ เราก็จะหาวิธีอยู่กับเธอให้ด้ายยย https://t.co/LePoIA9aW8

    27K109K90765View on X
  • May 5, 202619x their median

    Matthew McConaughey in kindergarten trying to spell his own name

    107K5.5K24335014M viewsView on X
  • Apr 14, 202617x their median

    Can’t believe this https://t.co/b0lbMwLGEc

    99K2.4K25834316M viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20269.9x their median

    ประกาศชี้แจงกรณีเหตุการณ์ภายในกิจกรรมรวมพล “งานมหกรรมนิยายนานาชาติ 2026” Official Statement Regarding the Recent Incident at the International Novel Festival 2026 #GMMTV https://t.co/UtXxCCAo6O

    19K15K11K14K25M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20256.6x their median

    Bringing a marker to life https://t.co/FrlSmAMszp

    33K1.1K1.5K4.1K31M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20266.3x their median

    Hello everyone, Regarding my past social media reposts, I want to begin by saying that I am truly sorry. I accept all criticism and sincerely apologize for everything that has happened. First, regarding the image of the gun that I reposted, I admit that it was thoughtless and an immature joke. Looking back, I recognize how foolish and irresponsible it was. This has been an important lesson for me, and I promise that nothing like this will ever happen again. I want to emphasize that I do not support violence in any form. I also want to emphasize that I respect people of all genders and sexual orientations, and I believe everyone deserves to be treated with dignity and equality. Many of the people around me, including friends and colleagues from the LGBTQ+ community, have shown me kindness, support, and guidance, for which I am truly grateful. I sincerely apologize for the things I reposted in the past and for the hurt and disappointment they may have caused. Although I made those reposts when I lacked the maturity to fully understand the impact of my actions, being young is absolutely not an excuse. I take full responsibility for what I did. I am genuinely sorry for my past actions. Every criticism I have received has been a valuable lesson, and I will use it to grow into a more thoughtful, respectful, and responsible person. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to apologize and explain myself.

    21K8.1K2.5K5.8K11M viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 20265.8x their median

    aquarium in keyboard https://t.co/WdfcCr9qth

    31K2.7K24047218M viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20263.1x their median

    Life is hierarchical https://t.co/vu3rk07BhD

    12K6032.0K3.5K52M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.9x their median

    ยีนส์พ่อยีนส์แม่ระดับ gold pro max แม่เกดสวยมาก น้องสกายหล่อมากกกกก โอ่ย https://t.co/qYABSqQGZG

    5.7K5.5K920304K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6.0K interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 2.00%. Posts are seen about 164K times each, and 3.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 54.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 148K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is ` กิกิ ·'s engagement rate on X?
` กิกิ · (@ggluvcats) has an engagement rate of 2.00%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 300,242 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.00%, ` กิกิ · sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ggluvcats have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ggluvcats post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going