Back to @getters_iida's profile

ゲッターズ飯田 engagement report

@getters_iida - 593K followers on X

Measured over 69 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 593K followers
Per impression
0.807%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
5.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
265
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 265 interactions against 593K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 69 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.807% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 69 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 98x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #amebaブログ, #アメブロ, #ゲッターズ飯田の五星三心占い2027.

Measured over 69 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026. Recurring tags: #amebaブログ, #アメブロ, #ゲッターズ飯田の五星三心占い2027.

Compared with accounts its own size

ゲッターズ飯田's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, ゲッターズ飯田 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link39% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 39% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 88 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 8, 202698x their median

    運がいいフリをして生活していると本当に運が良くなってくる。

    24K1.8K0585444K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202695x their median

    「最終的にはうまくいく」と思い込む人が運を掴む

    23K1.5K0202389K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202661x their median

    今までは関係ない。人生は常にこれから

    15K1.2K0103315K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202640x their median

    運気の良くなる手前が最も苦しく辛いもの。今が苦しく辛い時なら、あと一歩で流れが変わることを忘れないように

    10K583089227K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202639x their median

    人間は、暇だと不安になる。不安な時は暇だけ

    9.5K7390221362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202631x their median

    「変わろう」とする努力が見える人に運は味方する

    7.7K464029167K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202627x their median

    「いざとなればなんとかなる」と思える人に運は味方する

    6.9K280018109K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202624x their median

    運命の人に明日会えるかも知れないと思って日々生きれば出会えるもの

    6.1K312071159K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202622x their median

    運気のいい日は、迷ったらやる。運気の悪い日は、迷ったらやらない。これだけで人生はいい方向に進む。

    5.5K274010128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202622x their median

    運気の良い人と一緒にいることは大切ですが、ポジティブな人と一緒にいることはもっと大事。

    5.5K230023104K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#amebaブログ#アメブロ#ゲッターズ飯田の五星三心占い2027#ゲッターズ飯田#abcz

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 265 interactions against 593K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 69 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.807% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 69 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 98x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #amebaブログ, #アメブロ, #ゲッターズ飯田の五星三心占い2027.

What is ゲッターズ飯田's engagement rate on X?
ゲッターズ飯田 (@getters_iida) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 69 original posts from the last 30 days against 593,259 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, ゲッターズ飯田 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @getters_iida have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @getters_iida post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going