Back to @getters_iida's profile

ゲッターズ飯田 engagement report

@getters_iida - 593K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.229%
of 593K followers
Per impression
2.93%
46K views on a typical post
Reach
7.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.133%
62 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 593K followers, an engagement rate of 0.229%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 2.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #amebaブログ, #アメブロ.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #amebaブログ, #アメブロ.

Compared with accounts its own size

ゲッターズ飯田's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.229%, ゲッターズ飯田 sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20267.7x their median

    人間は、暇だと不安になる。不安な時は暇だけ

    9.5K7390221362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.1x their median

    「変わろう」とする努力が見える人に運は味方する

    7.7K464029167K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.3x their median

    「いざとなればなんとかなる」と思える人に運は味方する

    6.9K280018109K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.7x their median

    運命の人に明日会えるかも知れないと思って日々生きれば出会えるもの

    6.1K312071159K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.2x their median

    運気のいい日は、迷ったらやる。運気の悪い日は、迷ったらやらない。これだけで人生はいい方向に進む。

    5.5K274010128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.6x their median

    人生はつまらなそうな顔をしているとつまらなくなり、楽しそうにしていると楽しくなるもの。

    4.5K279032104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.5x their median

    仕事は生活のためにするのではなく「自分が幸福になるためにするもの」だと思える人に運が味方する。

    4.5K27001297K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.2x their median

    人に好かれたいなら、相手の話を楽しそうに聞くといいだけ。

    4.2K19204110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.1x their median

    一つ一つの出会いを大切にすれば自然と素敵な人に出会えるもの。

    2.7K1140653K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.1x their median

    現実をマイナスに受け止めない、何事からも学べて、成長するきっかけになるものと思って、もっと現実をプラスに受け止めるといい。

    2.7K15201060K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#amebaブログ#アメブロ

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 593K followers, an engagement rate of 0.229%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 2.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #amebaブログ, #アメブロ.

What is ゲッターズ飯田's engagement rate on X?
ゲッターズ飯田 (@getters_iida) has an engagement rate of 0.229%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 593,296 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.229%, ゲッターズ飯田 sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @getters_iida have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @getters_iida post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going