nick wright engagement report
@getnickwright - 663K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 663K followers, an engagement rate of 0.19%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 221K times each, and 0.571% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ad, #beardown, #breakdancersoftheweek.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #ad, #beardown, #breakdancersoftheweek.
Compared with accounts its own size
nick wright's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.19%, nick wright sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 50% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 4% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 240 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 2, 202618x their median
Last point, regardless of what you feel about Sophie Cunningham’s views, I think we can all agree that her mocking A’Ja online is tantamount to if Kent Bazemore went after LeBron during the ‘15 ECF. Just an absolutely absurd “Don’t poke the beast” moment from a bench player.
- Sep 10, 202612x their median
NIGHTMARE loss for the Pats. You blow a double digit lead to Drew Lock, can’t capitalize on Seattle’s 10 penalties, only scored a TD because of an under thrown PI, Romeo Doubs lays an egg, AJ Brown goes down with an injury and Drake Maye makes a catastrophic end of game error.
- Oct 2, 202611x their median
A’Ja Wilson is 4x MVP that’s about to win her 5th, 3x DPOY, 3x Champ & just put up 38 & 16 followed by a 36 & 10 to beat an excellent Fever team in an attempt to go back to back (again). She’s simply one of the greatest female athletes ever, and likely finishes her career as the unanimous WNBA GOAT.
- Sep 21, 20268.5x their median
NEVER A DOUBT. Patrick freaking Mahomes, 281 days after tearing his ACL he throws for 381 yards & looks all the way back. 2-0 & will only get better on both sides of the ball.
- Sep 10, 20268.2x their median
Whatever @kevinwildes’ worst nightmare of that game was… that was somehow 10x worse. My lord.
- Jul 19, 20267.0x their median
The sports gods are on Argentina’s side today. 🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷 https://t.co/JlqHzyTOIz
- Sep 10, 20265.9x their median
https://t.co/3GgTfJxt4Q
- Sep 28, 20263.1x their median
.@Chris_Broussard: “You lost the game, but it was not all a loss. You guys are this week’s #BreakdancersOfTheWeek! The New England Patriots take over!” 🕺 @getnickwright: “I think we need all the music at once. A cacophony of sounds fellas to the breakdancers.” 🎶🫨 https://t.co/LIYLfbEFqn
- Sep 25, 20263.1x their median
Given the Herbert & Jordan Love discourse this week, I feel like folks can only come to one logical conclusion: These quarterbacks must be massively overpaid! They’re compensated as if they can uplift their situation, but turns out they’re totally helpless!
- Jul 19, 20262.7x their median
My view from this Argentina home game. https://t.co/mivCoVP0pi
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 663K followers, an engagement rate of 0.19%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 221K times each, and 0.571% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 33% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ad, #beardown, #breakdancersoftheweek.
- What is nick wright's engagement rate on X?
- nick wright (@getnickwright) has an engagement rate of 0.19%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 663,460 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.19%, nick wright sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @getnickwright have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @getnickwright post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.