Back to @georginagio_bae's profile

Gigibae engagement report

@georginagio_bae - 301K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.21%
of 301K followers
Per impression
5.14%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
633
interactions (median)
Saved
0.114%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 633 interactions against 301K followers, an engagement rate of 0.21%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 5.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 48x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gigibae's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.21%, Gigibae sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,076 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,928 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 39 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 16, 202648x their median

    Cristiano Ronaldo is a mad man https://t.co/DABAa3X2hH

    29K1.7K3112162K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202628x their median

    Oh my God.! ❤️‍🔥 https://t.co/QU0OBMI5Xq

    17K38122953280K viewsView on X
  • Dec 2, 202017x their median

    Cristiano Ronaldo has now scored 750 goals for club and country 🤯 https://t.co/Y9BS0lSuUZ

    9.3K1.0K54210View on X
  • Sep 7, 202616x their median

    🤍✨ https://t.co/haVTL7WG3u

    10.0K2249418177K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202614x their median

    🇵🇹 كريستيانو 2017 بعد ما سجل 400 هدف " سأحاول تسجيل 400 هدف أخرى " 😂 واليوم يتبقى له 19 هدف فقط لـ يصل للألف هدف 🐐 https://t.co/VMkOtKg0am

    8.2K394155153K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20267.1x their median

    Black beauty 🖤✨ https://t.co/coEvsnunkf

    4.4K6937052K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20267.1x their median

    🤍✨ https://t.co/7YV0FMr6oH

    4.4K8116351K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20266.6x their median

    Pink 🩷 https://t.co/NVBlVqD58m

    4.0K11029247K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.2x their median

    Georgina Rodrigues in Red ♥️🍒 https://t.co/sFWeMpMewk

    3.3K5313043K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.3x their median

    Morning beautiful 💕 https://t.co/rZ79XvNXlo

    2.0K3824221K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 633 interactions against 301K followers, an engagement rate of 0.21%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 5.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 48x its own typical post.

What is Gigibae's engagement rate on X?
Gigibae (@georginagio_bae) has an engagement rate of 0.21%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 301,302 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.21%, Gigibae sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @georginagio_bae have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @georginagio_bae post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going