Pedro Baños Bajo engagement report
@geoestratego - 454K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 633 interactions against 454K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 113K times each, and 0.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 74% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 48x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mironews, #canal24horas, #exclusiva.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #mironews, #canal24horas, #exclusiva.
Compared with accounts its own size
Pedro Baños Bajo's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.139%, Pedro Baños Bajo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 42% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 74% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 74% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 375 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 202648x their median
JUST IN: 🇵🇰🇮🇱 The Pakistani government has officially decided to recognize Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a "terrorist." https://t.co/LIaitmLtg3
- Aug 21, 202625x their median
🇹🇷 Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: “We are not playing games. Israel has exceeded the limits of tolerance. Those who control Israel should pull the leash. The region cannot withstand any more Israeli provocations. I emphasize this.” https://t.co/kCqgvBxihb
- Sep 3, 202618x their median
🔴 #URGENTE | Bloqueados los 32 millones de ayuda urgente de la UE a Ceuta por la falta de respuestas de España a preguntas de Bruselas ✍️ Por @jsanhermelando https://t.co/ZkHAAjCf8H
- Aug 24, 202617x their median
“Un grupo de hackers "regala a España" los datos de 70.000 agentes del espionaje marroquí en plena crisis de Ceuta.” Lo que queremos es que nos regalen la relación de todos los españoles que actúan en beneficio de Marruecos. https://t.co/1mLmUh8iUB
- Aug 31, 202616x their median
Bufff https://t.co/dBxKoz7UhS
- Aug 27, 202612x their median
🔴 #EXCLUSIVA | Marlaska recibió el aviso del CNI la víspera de la invasión a través de la Guardia Civil en una red que usan Interior y Defensa Fuentes del Estado Mayor señalan que el día anterior a la avalancha se pasó la información a la Dirección General de Coordinación y Estudios, dependiente del ministro ✍️ Por @BraisCedeira 📲 Sigue leyendo: https://t.co/ZIHYtUVORt
- Aug 28, 202611x their median
🔴‼️ Marlaska tuvo tres informes de Inteligencia sobre el riesgo en Ceuta, uno de ellos implicando al Gobierno de Marruecos ✍️ Por @BraisCedeira https://t.co/n1HY3qUoYn
- Aug 31, 20269.8x their median
“Jabaroot, haz tu magia.” “Este es el plan vitando diseñado por la tiranía marroquí y aprobado por sus mentores anglosionistas.” Juan Manuel de Prada vuelve a clavarlo. https://t.co/7gPMneh8pQ
- Aug 19, 20268.5x their median
“España: 17.000 millones de euros para Ucrania a fondo perdido.” Mientras dejan desprotegidos territorios nacionales, amenazados por nuestros enemigos seculares. Acuérdate de esto también cuando te digan que los impuestos con los que te saquean son para sanidad y educación. Y todo porque al gobierno se lo piden quienes realmente dirigen la política nacional. https://t.co/gbldADsuSq
- Sep 18, 20267.3x their median
BREAKING: 🇪🇺 Europe reached record gas prices According to today's data, gas prices across the EU have reached historic price heights. Records were broken in Germany, France, Poland and Denmark. Diesel prices had their records broken in Germany, France, Italy and Latvia. Should the trend continue, all of the European Union's countries will reach their highest record gas prices at the pump in recorded history in the coming week. Several petroleum companies announced that every country in the European Union will reach an all-time high average gas price at the pump by next week.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 633 interactions against 454K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 113K times each, and 0.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 74% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 48x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mironews, #canal24horas, #exclusiva.
- What is Pedro Baños Bajo's engagement rate on X?
- Pedro Baños Bajo (@geoestratego) has an engagement rate of 0.139%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 454,184 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.139%, Pedro Baños Bajo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @geoestratego have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @geoestratego post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.1 posts per day across the measured window.