Back to @gataaasp's profile

Gataaasp engagement report

@gataaasp - 281K followers on X

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.261%
of 281K followers
Per impression
1.43%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
18.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
689
interactions (median)
Saved
0.369%
178 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 689 interactions against 281K followers, an engagement rate of 0.261%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.3K interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gataaasp's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.261%, Gataaasp sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link95% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 95% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 213 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 20267.7x their median

    Enquanto o corno dormia, eu aproveitava esse negão BBC! 🫦💦 Nossa como eu adoro um preto pauzudo! Esse rolê tá rolando lá no Grupinho Vip! 🔥 Veeeem ver como foi a primeira noite. https://t.co/EEuXFeHgrl https://t.co/JVLHeCbrqh

    4.9K394202238K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20267.1x their median

    Que tesãooooo me dá só de lembrar! 🔥💦 Reparou no corno ali na sua função? 🤘🏽Nossa duuuuuuvido vc não ficar com vontade de ir lá no site me ver gozar!!!! @demarco__igor https://t.co/LCI7yO3hDN https://t.co/L58uKdUZXa

    4.5K4107494K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.2x their median

    Olha o que eu tava pedindo pro macho fazer! 🤭 Ando tarada pra dar o cuzinho. Será que ele conseguiu? Segreeeedo! 🫣🔥 https://t.co/LCI7yO3hDN https://t.co/eZNHCmd8Zn

    2.7K1946085K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.1x their median

    Querendo ganhar leitinho do novinho, depois de já ter ganhado do outro novinho! 🫦💦 Veeeem pro meu grupinho ver como foi. https://t.co/EEuXFeHgrl https://t.co/jW5AXE4QlG

    2.6K20693102K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.9x their median

    Hmmm que delícia aprontar depois do pagode com o amigo do meu marido! ♠️🤘🏽 Quer ver o que rolou depois? Corre lá no meu Canal GRATUITO do Xvideos e dá uma conferida! 👇🏽 https://t.co/tQPkl3BSUt https://t.co/iKAKyccIjY

    2.5K18081149K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.9x their median

    Cada um no seu lugar né?! ♠️🤘🏽 Por isso que eu amo meu corno, ele é muito prestativo! Reparou no teto solar como tava quente ali dentro do carro? 🥵 Veeem pro site oficial acompanhar tudinho! https://t.co/LCI7yO3hDN https://t.co/XLTj9jvYSQ

    1.8K16110270K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.8x their median

    Já tinha sentado gostoso no carro, mas eu queria mais! 😈 Obveeeo que sentei de novo né?! E vc pode ver tudo no site oficial. Veeeeeem logo!!! 🔥 https://t.co/LCI7yO3hDN https://t.co/hOcJx3Suud

    1.8K14014043K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.7x their median

    Olhaa como o corno pegou a gente! 🔥🤘🏽 Ai que pena viuuuu, porque tava tão gostoso. 🤭 Depois teve treino no parque. @demarco__igor https://t.co/LCI7yO3hDN https://t.co/NaLREH6bQu

    1.7K1677072K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.3x their median

    Hmmmm sabia que eu esguichei gostoso na mão do meu amigo personal e deixei o banco do carro do corno tuuudo ensopado! 🔥💦 Veeem ver no site oficial esse SQUIRT delicioso, digno de cinema! https://t.co/LCI7yO3hDN https://t.co/rRvJZ4MJH3

    1.5K932146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.2x their median

    Consegue adivinhar onde a rola do macho tava?! 🫣🥯 Aiiii aumenta o som e escuta um pouquinho meu gemido! 😈 Quer ver mais? Veeem pro meu Grupinho VIP acompanhar esse rolê completo!!!! ♠️ https://t.co/EEuXFeHgrl https://t.co/sacIRWEmga

    1.4K1308056K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 689 interactions against 281K followers, an engagement rate of 0.261%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.3K interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post.

What is Gataaasp's engagement rate on X?
Gataaasp (@gataaasp) has an engagement rate of 0.261%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 281,308 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.261%, Gataaasp sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gataaasp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @gataaasp post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going