Gary Vaynerchuk engagement report
@garyvee - 3.1M followers on X
Measured over 276 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 238 interactions against 3.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 276 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.605% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 16.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 276 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 296x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #comiccon, #nycc26, #newprofilepic.
Measured over 276 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #comiccon, #nycc26, #newprofilepic.
Compared with accounts its own size
Gary Vaynerchuk's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.008%, Gary Vaynerchuk sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 18% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 29, 2026296x their median
I got a new job! I’m nearly 51 and didn’t think anyone would hire me but I have a new career, much better pay and soooo much more self worth. No one will see this as I have about 5 followers, but yay me!!
- Oct 11, 202653x their median
#Jets No. 2 overall pick David Bailey today vs. the Browns: • 3 sacks • 8 tackles (6 solo) • 4 tackles for loss • 4 QB hits • 1 forced fumble 🔥🔥 https://t.co/8Fbe1v40cC
- Sep 20, 202619x their median
just fuck Me … 💔 congrats to packer fans https://t.co/nQ1430CXiy
- Aug 17, 202616x their median
If you're dead fucking broke, but you're actually extremely nice, you are more a winner to me than someone who has a million dollars in their bank account. I know unlimited millionaires who are straight pieces of shit. I respect them zero. Please stop putting other people on a pedestal - for what - they made more money than you? They're more attractive than you? More people think they're cool? It's not fucking high school anymore. Stop putting other people on a pedestal and start putting yourself on a pedestal. Let me tell you why: Because you can choose what to put yourself on a pedestal of.
- Aug 20, 202614x their median
40 is a very fascinating age. A lot of people start reflecting on their lives when they hit their 40s, they think they’ve already “peaked.” Truth is… 40 isn’t even halftime yet. Even if you have a mortgage, too much debt, or too much responsibility, you have so much time to turn things around. It's fascinating what can happen to your life if you give yourself some grace. To all my 40-somethings out there ... please, change your perspective. You'll be stunned by how it changes your life.
- Sep 27, 202613x their median
The undermanned #Jets went toe-to-toe with one of the better teams in the NFL. They're headed in the right direction. You see that. It's a brutal loss, but these games weren't even close last year.
- Sep 4, 202613x their median
You are 100% in charge of your life. Stop being a bitch. This is your reminder … you’re capable .. you can do this … regardless of what’s tricking you into thinking you can't ❤️❤️❤️
- Aug 31, 202612x their median
Stop being scared - it’s in your head … no one cares if you miss https://t.co/tUluKn2cPO
- Aug 16, 202611x their median
NFT’s are a collectible - this isn’t a debate this is a fact In a time when 99% of regular people on earth 🌎 react with “scam or fad” when they hear the term NFT .. we have … 10,000’s of people collecting them .. Now .. they can do much more and are a functional collectible which we have never seen before .. so .. they will continue to innovate … Man this a fun era ❤️‼️
- Sep 8, 202611x their median
At 37 starting over isn't the risk. Spending another 20 years miserable is. At 28, 32, 37, 49... you're a kid, you got so much fucking time... I fucking worked at a liquor store when I was 34. At 37? You got fucking 40 more years of just operating, and then you'll decide at 77 if you want to keep going or chill. You got time ♥️
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 238 interactions against 3.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 276 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.605% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 16.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 276 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 296x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #comiccon, #nycc26, #newprofilepic.
- What is Gary Vaynerchuk's engagement rate on X?
- Gary Vaynerchuk (@garyvee) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 276 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,100,898 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.008%, Gary Vaynerchuk sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @garyvee have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @garyvee post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 16.23 posts per day across the measured window.