Gary O’Neill engagement report
@garyoneill - 952K followers on X
Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 952K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 0.079% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.266% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 726x its own typical post.
Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Gary O’Neill's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At under 0.001%, Gary O’Neill sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 147 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 18, 2026726x their median
Collected Grok Bot pro tips shared by the @bot team: 1) Connect multiple accounts across plugins (i.e. personal and work Gmail accounts) 2) One Chief of Staff plus a few specialists beats one mega-chat 3) Pin your top 1-2 agents for quick access 4) Have it keep a Notion page of outstanding work so you can ask "what's left" instead of babysitting 5) Treat each bot as a job, not a whole project 6) For difficult tasks, hit “teach a task” in the browser, record yourself doing it once, and the bot can repeat it 7) Ask the bot which team skills and plugins to turn on for your job 8) Tell your bot to generate an avatar for each of your bots 9) Consider turning on Always Allow and turning off Auto Review to make your bots more autonomous, make sure to test workflows first (be careful!) 10) Create sections in your sidebar to organize your bots 11) Resize the sidebar when you need additional space 12) Ask your bots to evaluate themselves and suggest improvements to workflows
- Aug 28, 2026626x their median
N3on starts his stream PERFECTLY recreating the VIRAL clip of himself from GTA 6 in real life with Camilla Araujo 😭 https://t.co/LFkgjIRwnB
- Aug 24, 202653x their median
Hot take: X right now is full of people glazing each other just to farm impressions. Everyone is boosting everyone, pretending everything is incredible and chasing the algorithm instead of actually building something worth talking about. It’s becoming an echo chamber.
- Jul 26, 202648x their median
A clean UI isn’t about looking modern. It’s about removing decisions the user shouldn’t have to make.
- Aug 16, 202617x their median
What’s the best business email provider? I’m stuck between Outlook and Gmail. Which one do you use for your business and would you recommend it?
- Aug 23, 202615x their median
The best code review removes more lines than it adds.
- Aug 23, 202612x their median
Quiet weeks of shipping with no applause are where the real product gets made.
- Aug 23, 202611x their median
Users do not care how clever the architecture is. They care if it works on the first try.
- Aug 23, 202611x their median
Most roadmaps are lists of things nobody will care about in 6 months.
- Aug 23, 202610x their median
Stop adding onboarding steps and make the product obvious.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 952K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 0.079% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.266% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 726x its own typical post.
- What is Gary O’Neill's engagement rate on X?
- Gary O’Neill (@garyoneill) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 951,955 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At under 0.001%, Gary O’Neill sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @garyoneill have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @garyoneill post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.