Back to @garciabanchs's profile

Ángel García Banchs engagement report

@garciabanchs - 348K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 348K followers
Per impression
2.55%
2.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
60
interactions (median)
Saved
0.129%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 348K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 4,346 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 2.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.671% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 120x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ángel García Banchs's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,346 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Ángel García Banchs sits above the 25th percentile of the 42,087 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.013% to 0.084%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.084%
p750.449%
p902.07%
p99143.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 42,087 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 84,187 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.084%
75th percentile0.449%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile143.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%59K
01:00 UTC-2%60K
02:00 UTC-4%58K
03:00 UTC-4%62K
04:00 UTC-6%50K
05:00 UTC-5%49K
06:00 UTC-5%56K
07:00 UTC-5%61K
08:00 UTC-4%71K
09:00 UTC-4%82K
10:00 UTC-3%84K
11:00 UTC-3%91K
12:00 UTC-2%100K
13:00 UTC-2%110K
14:00 UTC-3%113K
15:00 UTC-2%117K
16:00 UTC-3%114K
17:00 UTC-3%106K
18:00 UTC-2%99K
19:00 UTC-2%93K
20:00 UTC-1%87K
21:00 UTC-1%77K
22:00 UTC-2%67K
23:00 UTC-1%60K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%257K
Monday+1%329K
Tuesday-2%355K
Wednesday-4%323K
Thursday-3%273K
Friday-3%277K
Saturday+3%250K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 2020120x their median

    Hoy más que nunca reitero mi pronóstico de que Venezuela va a ser intervenida militarmente por los EE.UU. La fecha solo Dios y después Trump la saben. Cuando ocurra todo el mundo dirá es que era inevitable. La diferencia es que yo lo he sostenido antes, cuando nadie lo cree.

    5.0K1.5K581144View on X
  • Sep 1, 202621x their median

    El problema con Ricardo Haussmann es que su olfato es selectivo: Cuando pagó los intereses de los bonos 2020, siendo "ministro" de Guaidó, no le olió nada mal. Ese es el problema de los particularismos.

    820376401731K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.9x their median

    Caracas años 90. Arturo Uslar Pietri aborda de manera objetiva y sin apasionarse el tema petrolero https://t.co/IKQQCY3EJf

    250140111323K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20262.8x their median

    Intento decirlo lo más claro. Desde 2012 Dios ha puesto en mi corazón la Guerra Civil dentro del chavismo entre FANB, colectivos, pranes y paramilitares, con muchos muertos, sangre y violencia, para la depuración de Venezuela 🇻🇪 y luego ocupación territorial y Gobierno según Él.

    1142427246K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.1x their median

    Quien crea que el Acuerdo Caracas-Washington va a concretarse con los actores actuales no entiende que las petroleras no hundirán capital en Venezuela sino solo después de la Guerra Civil depuradoras y Ocupación Territorial pacificadora con una nueva Constitución, Estado, clase política y Gobierno de Reconstrucción.

    85291507.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.0x their median

    Ya que existe un brote psicótico de leguleyos en Venezuela filosofando sobre legitimidad, les hago una petición: Nónbrenme un sólo dirigente político cuya presidencia sea legitimada por elecciones internas de su partido político. Con uno me basta. Gracias.

    73311321.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.0x their median

    Cuando veas más de 100.000 soldados entrar en Venezuela 🇻🇪 y el establecimiento del Gobierno Cristocéntrico de Reconstrucción Nacional verás en cuestión de poco tiempo 200X de elevación: 2× por lo que nos quitó el enemigo 100× por liberar los talentos del subsuelo 200X = 2×100

    80201716.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261.7x their median

    Venezuela necesita mucho más que un cambio de líderes: un Gobierno Cristocéntrico de 30 millones de personas. Que Cristo gobierne en cada corazón y, desde allí, transforme nuestro orden espiritual, moral, cívico, político, institucional, económico y social. 🇻🇪✝️ https://t.co/iS4u3gM5Dz

    6828713.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    La búsqueda egoísta por parte de Diosdado del monopolio de la violencia producirá involuntariamente la eliminación del sistema de violencia policéntrica que impide hoy reconstruir un Estado. Él hará el mal pero Dios lo transformará para el bien de Venezuela y su reconstrucción.

    6616302.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Toda la clase política va a caer, y un Fondo Soberano Sempiterno donde tendrás saldo (entidad no estatal) será la que negocie con los consorcios, que se encargarán de negociar con petroleras, gasíferas, mineras, etc. Así puso el Señor en mi corazón https://t.co/4H6yJrpV6H

    6314103.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 348K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 4,346 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 2.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.671% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 120x its own typical post.

What is Ángel García Banchs's engagement rate on X?
Ángel García Banchs (@garciabanchs) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 347,943 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Ángel García Banchs sits above the 25th percentile of the 42,087 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @garciabanchs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,346 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @garciabanchs post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going