Back to @gailkimITSME's profile

Gail Kim-Irvine engagement report

@gailkimITSME - 390K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.067%
of 390K followers
Per impression
0.787%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
8.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
261
interactions (median)
Saved
0.045%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.5/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 261 interactions against 390K followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.787% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gail Kim-Irvine's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.067%, Gail Kim-Irvine sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202656x their median

    This show has to be the most surreal thing I’ve ever seen with my own two eyes lmao @bzw_wrestling https://t.co/obGloDZsQS

    13K1.3K2072861.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202629x their median

    “you'll never do a whole lot unless you're brave enough to try” - @DollyParton https://t.co/9TfDmGlW8x

    7.1K52825376K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202622x their median

    Watch Rebel’s ALS tidbit of the week where she is spreading awareness and sharing her journey. Please help spread the word and support @iamalsorg to raise funds for research and a cure! We love you @RebelTanea and we are all supporting you 🥰❤️ https://t.co/1OjXHGItz3

    4.9K78410833244K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202619x their median

    Tony Schiavone completed the ALS Ice Bucket challenge for Rebel. ❤️ BY TAKING 3 DIFFERENT ICE DUMPS VIA HIS GRANDCHILDREN. 😭 https://t.co/RH0qLwMWNr

    4.6K333227148K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202611x their median

    I never ever hardly talk about all the bad stuff or negative stuff I deal with online. I have decided to not pay attention to any of it, because I truly have a great life. I have also learned I have more to lose if I ever respond to anyone. I have big dreams and I don't want to risk any of that, however, the reason I am tweeting this is that it's really bad out there for females especially in a male dominated field. Like bad. There are really bad people out there that get a kick out of the things they do and say. They also have people that support them and their actions. The one thing I want everyone to know, is that I am very mentally strong. I have been in this game now for years and I keep on thriving because I work hard, I keep my head down and let karma handle the rest. I will continue to carry myself with grace, kindness and professionalism.

    2.5K18628141221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.4x their median

    Never forget: the ENTIRE PREMISE of pro wrestling is predicated on deceit. On a lie. On keeping secrets from the audience. On codes of silence & power imbalance. The further away we get from that, the better for everyone Long fucking way to go (clearly) but please keep caring & please keep pulling that curtain back 💕

    6515913541406K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.9x their median

    Omg finding out about Dolly Parton just now 💔 she was just the brightest shining light in a world that sometimes just feels so negative. She will be so missed and she set a great example of who used her platform/celebrity to give back and be a positive influence to the world. Will miss you Dolly Parton RIP 💕🥰

    664791219.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.7x their median

    do you think I can survive a wrestling training 🫢

    34798310205K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Jamie Hayter: “There’s some inherent misogyny in wrestling as a whole” https://t.co/ldwZ81Hz5E https://t.co/B0fUIRktNn

    20028622874K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    From yesterday: ESPN denied a report saying it's decided not to renew WWE PLE rights when the deal expires in ~2030. ESPN said the reporter didn't request comment before publishing. We asked and he said he sent inquiries to fan support contacts but not PR. https://t.co/GGegwrGJdB

    191304325127K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 261 interactions against 390K followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.787% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

What is Gail Kim-Irvine's engagement rate on X?
Gail Kim-Irvine (@gailkimITSME) has an engagement rate of 0.067%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 389,511 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.067%, Gail Kim-Irvine sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @gailkimITSME have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @gailkimITSME post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going