Back to @futnatv's profile

futnatv.net engagement report

@futnatv - 225K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.242%
of 225K followers
Per impression
1.46%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
16.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
547
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 547 interactions against 225K followers, an engagement rate of 0.242%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #azzurri, #italiabelgio, #nationsleague.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #azzurri, #italiabelgio, #nationsleague.

Compared with accounts its own size

futnatv.net's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.242%, futnatv.net sits above the 50th percentile of the 198,354 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.14% to 0.665%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.14%
p750.665%
p902.52%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 198,354 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,930 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.14%
75th percentile0.665%
90th percentile2.52%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 276 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 202678x their median

    tinha q proibir nao po kkkkkkkk https://t.co/92ARqMzZZs

    39K2.6K2364031.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202651x their median

    tire suas patas imundas do país do verdadeiro futebol https://t.co/vU62TvnxvP

    23K4.4K224263371K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202632x their median

    Data FIFA já é triste por natureza. Mas uma Data FIFA de DEZESSEIS DIAS pra ver o Brasil jogar duas vezes contra a Austrália e depois contra a Índia é de dar depressão profunda.

    16K1.3K173123283K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202621x their median

    A ida da Premier League pra CazéTV está mostrando o quanto futebol europeu é nichado no Brasil. Everton x Manchester United com menos gente assistindo simultaneamente que Coritiba x Chapecoense pelo Brasileirão, que passou no canal uns meses atrás. A bolha da internet faz parecer que todo brasileiro que gosta de futebol acompanha campeonatos europeus, mas a realidade é bem diferente.

    10K208478141842K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202614x their median

    LaLiga passando em 4K na CazéTV, mesma qualidade dos jogos da Copa do Mundo e... DE GRAÇA! O Disney+ passou anos com os direitos da competição cobrando 70 reais por mês pra assistir em 1080p naquele player horrível. Mas ver jogo na CazéTV é ruim porque tem bet anunciando 😭 https://t.co/3fuz7gDHuH

    7.1K271858143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202612x their median

    Absurdo completo o que o G1/GE fez. Imputaram um crime gravíssimo ao Renyer, jogador do Azuriz, simplesmente porque confundiram o nome dele com HAYNER, do Vila Nova. Uma aula de péssimo jornalismo, falta de checagem e irresponsabilidade. Deram o cara como PRESO. Imagina a família dele vendo isso. Apagaram a matéria, mas no cache do Google ainda dá pra encontrar. Bizarro.

    6.2K2577139258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20269.4x their median

    "Ain, pelo menos agora vai dar pra assistir jogo no YT sem comercial de bet" Claro, vão comprar direitos por milhões, montar equipe, pagar narrador e estrutura pra transmitir campeonato DE GRAÇA pra você sem patrocínio nenhum. Teu destino é ver jogo em IPTV em 240p travando.

    4.5K21939569255K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20267.6x their median

    A Globo demitindo executivo até da área financeira por causa da cagada que fez na Copa do Mundo. Mas quando eu falava que abrir mão de METADE da competição era um erro grotesco, aparecia Cuiteiro fanboy de emissora jurando que ninguém ligava para jogo que não fosse do Brasil. Teve semifinal de Copa exclusiva na internet enquanto a Globo passava Sessão da Tarde, mas os especialistas garantiam que estava tudo dentro do plano. Até a própria Globo aparentemente entendeu internamente que fez merda. Só falta avisar aos malucos que passaram a Copa inteira defendendo a decisão. Teve gente discutindo comigo que novela das 9 tinha mais repercussão que jogo da Argentina, pô KKKKKKK

    4.0K123416118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20265.7x their median

    Tem uma empresa aí que descobriu uma estratégia de marketing genial: espalhar que vai patrocinar clube, deixar circular proposta milionária, mas sem intenção nenhuma de concretizar. Enquanto isso, sites e perfis de futebol desesperados por clique fazem todo o trabalho de divulgação da marca DE GRAÇA. É uma estratégia brilhante de publicidade. Bastante antiética também, mas considerando o ramo de atuação da empresa, acho que ética não deve ser exatamente uma preocupação deles.

    3.0K60579179K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.0x their median

    A XSports tem os direitos da Bundesliga e da Ligue 1. Poderia estar passando Bayern ou PSG. Mas está passando Al-Nassr pelo Campeonato Saudita. E o pior: isso foi decidido por ENQUETE. O público teve a oportunidade de escolher e democraticamente optou pelo pior jogo. A democracia é um erro.

    2.6K477110156K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#azzurri#italiabelgio#nationsleague#nazionale#vivoazzurro

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 547 interactions against 225K followers, an engagement rate of 0.242%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #azzurri, #italiabelgio, #nationsleague.

What is futnatv.net's engagement rate on X?
futnatv.net (@futnatv) has an engagement rate of 0.242%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 224,631 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.242%, futnatv.net sits above the 50th percentile of the 198,354 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @futnatv have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @futnatv post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going