Back to @fuqiba123's profile

夫妻圈交友 engagement report

@fuqiba123 - 92K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 92K followers
Per impression
0.119%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
22.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.119% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85 interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

夫妻圈交友's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, 夫妻圈交友 sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,920 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.149%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.706%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,920 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,716 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.706%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 69 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20263.5x their median

    夫妻交友最初的方式,就是旅游的篝火聚会,白天游玩,晚上篝火喝茶聊天,深夜了交换好各自伴侣的游戏,来一起开发成长,分享乐趣!欢迎有缘的你们来圈内交朋友。

    10075026K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.2x their median

    圈子里的活动时,如果2对或多对夫妻一起聚会时,往往都会考虑增加单男,极少会有增加单女的活动,因增加单男活动往往更快乐,也更精彩。 https://t.co/dh7DUwI26y

    18256043K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20263.1x their median

    各位大佬,不用投诉我了,你们的图片我也不转载了,我知道你是有版权的,但请不要忘记我也有投诉你们色情的权利,不想这么做而已,如果再搞我,我就干你了。重点,爱玩。

    4070024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.5x their median

    圈中交友游戏中,卡颜值的有多少朋友呢?这样的伙伴,交友聚会中并不多吧。

    5155021K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.4x their median

    如果爱好旅行,如果可以找到本地的FQ一起玩乐,是一件很开心的事情。 https://t.co/rVqD7JSzxx

    7248020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.4x their median

    这是一次约好的,各自带着结婚证,也戴着婚戒,交换女伴后,前后进酒店开房,会认为是一对情侣或者是夫妻。 但我们是进了房才一起亲密的。 https://t.co/Swj8tN8tXi

    5052027K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.3x their median

    只要是以两人的真诚去圈子的活动行为,都是我们欣赏的,也是想要认识的朋友,在活动中遵守规则也有礼貌更懂得保护另外一半,必须要给予肯定和支持,玩法不同,更多是要多沟通,而不是去互相攻击。 https://t.co/C3kJPUui1A

    15039037K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.2x their median

    夫妻交友里,没有长久的固定小圈子的,只有一段时间内的固定圈子,现在各个城市的固定圈子越来越难以加入,很多都要熟人介绍的。 https://t.co/y5Ztvismzs

    6046021K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.1x their median

    圈子的朋友们,当你把和你活动过的夫妻或单身朋友,介绍给你另一个圈子活动过的共好者前,请先先问问别人接受转介绍不,没有同意前,是不能直接转介的,这种不叫介绍,叫出卖。 https://t.co/4AsxUjszZY

    19230038K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.9x their median

    夫妻的圈子里,现在是不是也迎来00后当主力的年代了,最近很多00后进入这个圈了,聊了几对都是,听说他们玩得更疯,那些90后能不能和他们一起呢?群里聊聊。 https://t.co/NvFeiS6WMp

    11035022K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 21,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.119% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 85 interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

What is 夫妻圈交友's engagement rate on X?
夫妻圈交友 (@fuqiba123) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,308 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, 夫妻圈交友 sits above the 25th percentile of the 218,920 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fuqiba123 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fuqiba123 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going