Back to @funnybrad's profile

Brad Williams engagement report

@funnybrad - 188K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 188K followers
Per impression
0.839%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
52
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 188K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 0.839% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 89x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brad Williams's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Brad Williams sits above the 25th percentile of the 151,672 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.021% to 0.126%.

p100.003%
p250.021%
p50 (median)0.126%
p750.6%
p902.29%
p9984.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 151,672 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 27,163 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.021%
50th percentile0.126%
75th percentile0.6%
90th percentile2.29%
99th percentile84.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 94 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 202689x their median

    Dreams do come true!   New episode of @heightenedbabbl every Tuesday with @ball4president https://t.co/4roYGtFu0K

    4.4K22832596K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 202682x their median

    Bradhausen! Thank you @WWE and Danhausen for a very nice, very evil weekend at SummerSlam! https://t.co/DycuRQBV0V

    3.9K3126235138K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202676x their median

    Wife and I got all dressed up and got our kicks at @appletv’s #TedLasso season 4 premiere! First two episodes were amazing and I’m stoked to see the rest of the season. Congratulations to everyone who makes the show happen! https://t.co/lEpS7mLZ5M

    3.8K65825353K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202622x their median

    Not even an ounce of hesitation from Michael.   New episode of @heightenedbabbl every Tuesday with @ball4president https://t.co/70MLEzF2Sh

    1.1K337027K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202614x their median

    They had to fill the block! @heightenedbabbl @Ball4President https://t.co/tf9m1G2PTP

    6523749415K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20264.5x their median

    Some more photos from my weekend as a Minihausen at @wwe #Summerslam Including a hit on ESPN, meeting the Super Troopers, and just causing havoc in a very nice, very evil way. Thanks Danhausen! https://t.co/6eFIv8BX9X

    21613709.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.9x their median

    HAWAII SHOW POSTPONED. Apologies to everyone but due to Tropical Storm Lala, we are postponing the show tonight in Waimea at the Kahilu Theatre. The show will be moved to January 16. All tickets will be honored. Be safe out there. Apologies and Mahalo. https://t.co/VXE9NVN3Tv

    18778112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.1x their median

    Thank you to the Ted Lasso team for the incredible merch box! Catch the new season of Ted Lasso on Apple TV now. https://t.co/4WG1Ro61yR

    1449807.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.8x their median

    We've got a Code A! @heightenedbabbl @Ball4President https://t.co/KCm3RK1Gbh

    1386107.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.7x their median

    A golf time just opened up!   New episode of @heightenedbabbl every Tuesday with @Ball4President The Tall Tales Tour is live almost every weekend! Tickets at https://t.co/nVR3WApwpE https://t.co/xAylrayYhG

    1344008.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 188K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 0.839% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 89x its own typical post.

What is Brad Williams's engagement rate on X?
Brad Williams (@funnybrad) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 187,745 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Brad Williams sits above the 25th percentile of the 151,672 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @funnybrad have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @funnybrad post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going